I have code like this in my code:

let [a, b, c, d, e] = await ponent.getState.call(game.gameId);

Variables b, c, e used below in code but not a and d. In the same time I have eslint check that marks unused variables.

Is there any way to write destruction more correct to resolve this issue? I know about esling-disable-line no-unused but prefer to avoid it.

I have code like this in my code:

let [a, b, c, d, e] = await ponent.getState.call(game.gameId);

Variables b, c, e used below in code but not a and d. In the same time I have eslint check that marks unused variables.

Is there any way to write destruction more correct to resolve this issue? I know about esling-disable-line no-unused but prefer to avoid it.

• javascript
• eslint
• destruction

• 6 You can just omit non-used variables, let [, b, c, , e] = – ASDFGerte Commented Jun 29, 2018 at 6:05
• @ASDFGerte just noted that you already mented much before, please add this as answer :) – kiddorails Commented Jun 29, 2018 at 6:30
• @ASDFGerte you are fantastic! – Alex G.P. Commented Jun 29, 2018 at 6:49
• @kiddorails Should a question's answer boil down to a very short fact, a ment may e close to it already. I rarely post answers these days, unless the situation explicitly demands it. This is because answers imply pleteness, require longer flavor-text, and potential follow-ups. Also rep doesn't concern me much. I potentially may not have time or motivation for follow-ups, and could not answer details about ESlint, as I have very little experience with it (likely less than OP - here, a javascript syntax detail just happened to be relevant). That you post it as answer is pletely fine. – ASDFGerte Commented Jun 29, 2018 at 7:03

1 Answer 1

Replace it with empty placeholders:

let [, b, c, , e] = await ponent.getState.call(game.gameId);