te')); return $arr; } /* 遍历用户所有主题 * @param $uid 用户ID * @param int $page 页数 * @param int $pagesize 每页记录条数 * @param bool $desc 排序方式 TRUE降序 FALSE升序 * @param string $key 返回的数组用那一列的值作为 key * @param array $col 查询哪些列 */ function thread_tid_find_by_uid($uid, $page = 1, $pagesize = 1000, $desc = TRUE, $key = 'tid', $col = array()) { if (empty($uid)) return array(); $orderby = TRUE == $desc ? -1 : 1; $arr = thread_tid__find($cond = array('uid' => $uid), array('tid' => $orderby), $page, $pagesize, $key, $col); return $arr; } // 遍历栏目下tid 支持数组 $fid = array(1,2,3) function thread_tid_find_by_fid($fid, $page = 1, $pagesize = 1000, $desc = TRUE) { if (empty($fid)) return array(); $orderby = TRUE == $desc ? -1 : 1; $arr = thread_tid__find($cond = array('fid' => $fid), array('tid' => $orderby), $page, $pagesize, 'tid', array('tid', 'verify_date')); return $arr; } function thread_tid_delete($tid) { if (empty($tid)) return FALSE; $r = thread_tid__delete(array('tid' => $tid)); return $r; } function thread_tid_count() { $n = thread_tid__count(); return $n; } // 统计用户主题数 大数量下严谨使用非主键统计 function thread_uid_count($uid) { $n = thread_tid__count(array('uid' => $uid)); return $n; } // 统计栏目主题数 大数量下严谨使用非主键统计 function thread_fid_count($fid) { $n = thread_tid__count(array('fid' => $fid)); return $n; } ?>c++ - Allowing a function to accept braced initializer lists without another overload - Stack Overflow
最新消息:雨落星辰是一个专注网站SEO优化、网站SEO诊断、搜索引擎研究、网络营销推广、网站策划运营及站长类的自媒体原创博客

c++ - Allowing a function to accept braced initializer lists without another overload - Stack Overflow

programmeradmin2浏览0评论

I have a function which accepts arbitrary iterable objects/containers:

auto iterate(auto&& iterable);

And it operates on them using range-based for-loops in a generic manner.

This works fine with standard containers, C-style arrays, and std::generator, but it fails when I try to pass it an init-list:

iterate({1, 2, 3});

I get the error error: no matching function for call to ‘iterate(<brace-enclosed initializer list>) and couldn’t deduce template parameter ‘auto:57’.

How can I include initalizer lists in the considered candidates for deduction without writing a separate overload? I need it to be only one function because I also want to write iterator-based utilities that operate on multiple iterables, and I don't know how to write functions that would operate on all of them easily if I had to write multiple functions for each combination of ordinary iterable and init-list.

I have a function which accepts arbitrary iterable objects/containers:

auto iterate(auto&& iterable);

And it operates on them using range-based for-loops in a generic manner.

This works fine with standard containers, C-style arrays, and std::generator, but it fails when I try to pass it an init-list:

iterate({1, 2, 3});

I get the error error: no matching function for call to ‘iterate(<brace-enclosed initializer list>) and couldn’t deduce template parameter ‘auto:57’.

How can I include initalizer lists in the considered candidates for deduction without writing a separate overload? I need it to be only one function because I also want to write iterator-based utilities that operate on multiple iterables, and I don't know how to write functions that would operate on all of them easily if I had to write multiple functions for each combination of ordinary iterable and init-list.

Share Improve this question asked Feb 17 at 22:32 HeliumHydrideHeliumHydride 811 silver badge5 bronze badges 6
  • <brace-enclosed initializer list> is a great hint that {1, 2, 3} has no type. Hence, couldn’t deduce template parameter. You should overload iterate for std::initializer_list<auto>. – 3CxEZiVlQ Commented Feb 17 at 22:36
  • The problem is I don't want another overload because it would complicate the other utilities I'm trying to write. I just want it to deduce as an std::initializer_list automatically. – HeliumHydride Commented Feb 17 at 22:42
  • If you don't want to overload the function (e.g. to accept an initializer_list) then you need to help the compiler by creating a suitable container at the call point. For example, iterate(std::vector<int>{1,2,3}). Probably simpler (and less expensive) to create an overload (templated if necessary) that accepts a suitable initializer_list. – Peter Commented Feb 18 at 4:17
  • Related question: stackoverflow/questions/17384193/… – ThePirate42 Commented yesterday
  • @Peter A probably less expensive alternative is iterate(std::array{1,2,3}). It should roughly be as expensive as an std::initializer_list – ThePirate42 Commented yesterday
 |  Show 1 more comment

1 Answer 1

Reset to default 0

I know you want to avoid an overload, but since you are using C++20 or later, your best option looks to be to add one that delegates to your existing function by passing it a std::span, like so:

template <class T> auto iterate
    (std::initializer_list <T> il)
{
    std::span s {il.begin (), il.end ()};
    return iterate (s);
}

A span is cheap to construct (might even be free, in this situation), but maybe adding an overload adds too much boilerplate, we don't have enough context to know.

发布评论

评论列表(0)

  1. 暂无评论