If I have two fields, I'd just like to validate when at least one field is a non empty string, but fail when both fields are empty strings.
Something like this does not validate
var schema = Joi.object().keys({
a: Joi.string(),
b: Joi.string()
}).or('a', 'b');
When validating against
{a: 'aa', b: ''}
The or
condition only tests for the presence of either key a
or b
, but does test whether the condition for a
or b
is true. Joi.string()
will fail for empty strings.
Here is gist with some test cases to demonstrate
/?gist=84c49d8b81025ce68cfb
If I have two fields, I'd just like to validate when at least one field is a non empty string, but fail when both fields are empty strings.
Something like this does not validate
var schema = Joi.object().keys({
a: Joi.string(),
b: Joi.string()
}).or('a', 'b');
When validating against
{a: 'aa', b: ''}
The or
condition only tests for the presence of either key a
or b
, but does test whether the condition for a
or b
is true. Joi.string()
will fail for empty strings.
Here is gist with some test cases to demonstrate
http://requirebin.com/?gist=84c49d8b81025ce68cfb
Share Improve this question edited Mar 5, 2015 at 10:50 Brendan asked Mar 4, 2015 at 20:59 BrendanBrendan 8291 gold badge8 silver badges13 bronze badges6 Answers
Reset to default 33Code below worked for me. I used alternatives because .or is really testing for the existence of keys and what you really wanted was an alternative where you would allow one key or the other to be empty.
var console = require("consoleit");
var Joi = require('joi');
var schema = Joi.alternatives().try(
Joi.object().keys({
a: Joi.string().allow(''),
b: Joi.string()
}),
Joi.object().keys({
a: Joi.string(),
b: Joi.string().allow('')
})
);
var tests = [
// both empty - should fail
{a: '', b: ''},
// one not empty - should pass but is FAILING
{a: 'aa', b: ''},
// both not empty - should pass
{a: 'aa', b: 'bb'},
// one not empty, other key missing - should pass
{a: 'aa'}
];
for(var i = 0; i < tests.length; i++) {
console.log(i, Joi.validate(tests[i], schema)['error']);
}
An alternative way of using Joi.when() that worked for me:
var schema = Joi.object().keys({
a: Joi.string().allow(''),
b: Joi.when('a', { is: '', then: Joi.string(), otherwise: Joi.string().allow('') })
}).or('a', 'b')
.or('a', 'b')
prevents a
AND b
being null (as opposed to '').
If you want to express the dependency between 2 fields without having to repeat all other parts of the object, you could use when:
var schema = Joi.object().keys({
a: Joi.string().allow(''),
b: Joi.string().allow('').when('a', { is: '', then: Joi.string() })
}).or('a', 'b');
You could just use .xor('a', 'b')
instead .or('a', 'b')
:
var schema = Joi.object().keys({
a: Joi.string(),
b: Joi.string()
}).xor('a', 'b');
This allows to be or only a or only b but not both, and not none
if your object is:
{ a: 'non-empty' } or { b: 'non-empty' }
will pass
if your object is:
{ a: '', b: '' } or { a: 'non-empty', b: 'non-empty' }
will NOT pass
if your object is:
{ a: ''} or { b: '' }
will NOT pass
if your object is:
{ a: '', b: 'non-empty' } or { a: 'non-empty', b: '' }
will NOT pass
if your object is:
{ }
will NOT pass
the problem I faced with https://stackoverflow.com/a/61212051/15265372 answer is that if both fields are given you won't face any errors, if you want to fix that you need to replace or
with xor
.
&. Simply u can use '.and()'
- it will not pass if either one of the fields is empty
var schema = Joi.object().keys({
a: Joi.string(),
b: Joi.string()
}).and('a', 'b');````