It sounds a lot more plicated than it really is.
So in Perl, you can do something like this:
foreach my $var (@vars) {
$hash_table{$var->{'id'}} = $var->{'data'};
}
I have a JSON object and I want to do the same thing, but with a javascript associative array in jQuery.
I've tried the following:
hash_table = new Array();
$.each(data.results), function(name, result) {
hash_table[result.(name).extra_info.a] = result.(name).some_dataset;
});
Where data is a JSON object gotten from a $.getJSON call. It looks more or less like this (my JSON syntax may be a little off, sorry):
{
results:{
datasets_a:{
dataset_one:{
data:{
//stuff
}
extra_info:{
//stuff
}
}
dataset_two:{
...
}
...
}
datasets_b:{
...
}
}
}
But every time I do this, firebug throws the following error:
"XML filter is applied to non-xml data"
It sounds a lot more plicated than it really is.
So in Perl, you can do something like this:
foreach my $var (@vars) {
$hash_table{$var->{'id'}} = $var->{'data'};
}
I have a JSON object and I want to do the same thing, but with a javascript associative array in jQuery.
I've tried the following:
hash_table = new Array();
$.each(data.results), function(name, result) {
hash_table[result.(name).extra_info.a] = result.(name).some_dataset;
});
Where data is a JSON object gotten from a $.getJSON call. It looks more or less like this (my JSON syntax may be a little off, sorry):
{
results:{
datasets_a:{
dataset_one:{
data:{
//stuff
}
extra_info:{
//stuff
}
}
dataset_two:{
...
}
...
}
datasets_b:{
...
}
}
}
But every time I do this, firebug throws the following error:
"XML filter is applied to non-xml data"
Share Improve this question asked Oct 24, 2008 at 13:54 LeananLeanan 7327 silver badges13 bronze badges3 Answers
Reset to default 3I think you can use the JSON response as an associative array. So you should be able to go directly in and use the JSON.
Assuming you received the above example:
$('result').innerHTML = data['results']['dataset_a']['dataset_two']['data'];
// Or the shorter form:
$('result').innerHTML = data.results.dataset_a.dataset_two.data;
Understand that I haven't tested this, but it's safer to use the square brackets with a variable than it is to use parenthesis plus the name with the dot accessor.
Your example is failing because of some convoluted logic I just caught.
$.each(data.results), function(name, result) {
hash_table[result.(name).extra_info.a] = result.(name).some_dataset;
});
Now, the foreach loop goes through the variable data.results
to find the internal elements at a depth of 1. The item it finds is given to the lambda with the key of the item. AKA, the first result will be name = "datasets_a" item = object
. Following me so far? Now you access the returned hash, the object in item
, as though it has the child key in name
... "datasets_a". But wait, this is the object!
If all else fails... write your result JSON into a text field dynamically and ensure it is formatted properly.
Why would you want to change an array into another array ?-)
-- why not simply access the data, if you want to simplify or filter, you can traverse the arrays of the object directly !-)
This works. Just dump it into a script block to test.
d = {
'results':{
'datasets_a':{
'dataset_one':{
'data':{
'sample':'hello'
},
'extra_info':{
//stuff
}
},
'dataset_two':{
///
}
///
},
'datasets_b':{
///
}
}
}
alert(d.results.datasets_a.dataset_one.data.sample)
I hope this pasted in correctly. This editor doesn't like my line breaks in code.
d = {
'results':{
'datasets_a':{
'dataset_one':{
'data':{
'sample':'hello'
},
'extra_info':{
//stuff
}
},
'dataset_two':{
///
}
///
},
'datasets_b':{
///
}
}
};
alert(d.results.datasets_a.dataset_one.data.sample)