最新消息:雨落星辰是一个专注网站SEO优化、网站SEO诊断、搜索引擎研究、网络营销推广、网站策划运营及站长类的自媒体原创博客

asp.net - window.location change fails AJAX call - Stack Overflow

programmeradmin0浏览0评论

I've got a click tracking AJAX function (calls a WebMethod on an .aspx page), and I need to call it when the user clicks through to a link.

Unfortunately, I'm using window.location = "newUrl" to change the page, which seems to make the AJAX call fail. Is there a way around this?

I do not need to get any information back from the AJAX call, I just need to make sure the WebMethod is called.

I'm aware that I could just redirect on the success() or failure() calls, but then I would have to wait for the clickTracking() method to run, which takes ~ 1s. That is not acceptable by the agreement in the project spec, and so is not a viable solution.

I've got a click tracking AJAX function (calls a WebMethod on an .aspx page), and I need to call it when the user clicks through to a link.

Unfortunately, I'm using window.location = "newUrl" to change the page, which seems to make the AJAX call fail. Is there a way around this?

I do not need to get any information back from the AJAX call, I just need to make sure the WebMethod is called.

I'm aware that I could just redirect on the success() or failure() calls, but then I would have to wait for the clickTracking() method to run, which takes ~ 1s. That is not acceptable by the agreement in the project spec, and so is not a viable solution.

Share Improve this question edited Feb 12, 2010 at 15:52 George Stocker 57.9k29 gold badges181 silver badges238 bronze badges asked Feb 12, 2010 at 15:34 Ed JamesEd James 10.6k16 gold badges75 silver badges103 bronze badges 2
  • @Ed: Will your users really have a ~1s latency to your host. That may be a very conservative estimate. I would aim for 100ms. – Daniel Vassallo Commented Feb 12, 2010 at 15:55
  • @Daniel We have an agreement for about 1s on most pages full turnaround, in practise they expect much lower, and the trackclick method does some surprisingly time-expensive stuff (this may be streamlined at a later date). Suffice to say, waiting for the method to plete is not a viable option, hence the use of AJAX in the first place. – Ed James Commented Feb 12, 2010 at 16:02
Add a ment  | 

3 Answers 3

Reset to default 3

Instead of using AJAX, why don't you just send the user to an ASPX page that records the click and then sends the location header to redirect to the new url? For instance, on link click, the following would occur:

window.location = "/redirect.aspx?track=true&url=" + encodeURIComponent(newUrl);

redirect.aspx would then handle both the tracking and the redirecting to the new URL. That's pretty much the only way you can do it without waiting for an AJAX request to plete before sending the user on their way.

See also: Redirecting Users to Another Page (MSDN)

It's probably worth noting that you see this method every day on many sites. Most monly, they are found in ads. An AdSense ad link looks like this:

http://www.google./aclk
    ?sa=L&ai=C6DnFKnl1S5zhKoSBjAeqyKzKBPOD_2ehlIXfD9WsvQsQAVDQzK______
    8BYLvOuYPQCsgBAaoEGU_Q8k4OJin9jMDXAD6KQ_2Dsv7xyokLxRY
    &num=1&ggladgrp=13269254452699041863&gglcreat=8511532373602616220
    &sig=AGiWqtwzFm2sTimBuQpkD5kazyRNkkqH3w
    &q=http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/%3Fie%3DUTF8%26keywords%3Dhello%2Bworld

ish, anyway (I knocked it down a bit). When you click it, you land at http://www.google./aclk, which redirects you to the end site after tracking the click.

I just need to make sure the WebMethod is called.

If the above is really important, you can do the following:

function onLinkClicked() {
    $.ajax({
        url: 'WebMethod.aspx',
        success: function(data) {
            window.location = "newUrl";
        }
    });
}

There will be some latency from when the page will redirect. This may or may not be acceptable, depending on your application and on the average latency from your users to your host.


EDIT:

Further to the new ment below, unfortunately the window.location change will interrupt your AJAX request.

For internal links: You may want to track your links as soon as the users land on the new page, instead of when they click on the hyperlink.

For external links: I would use a server side redirect method, as Andy E suggested in another answer.

Use an <iframe> wrapper to wrap your pages. Then, when you have an AJAX request, pass the request up to the wrapper and navigate on the <iframe>. Doing this will give you the ability to have a perfectly asynchronous request while still maintaining app responsiveness.

Granted, you're also not changing the address bar and effectively killing your SEO, but that's the tradeoff for having a bad architecture. The fact that your click tracking function takes about a second is simply appalling. Perhaps you should start it on an asynchronous thread on the server and just serve the data to the client with a separate thread (System.Threading). That would alleviate the problems you're experiencing.

Otherwise, you can have asynchronous, reliable, or "not hacked together". Pick any two.

EDIT

My bad, you can also run your AJAX request as a popup:

window.open(url,'ajax','height=0,width=0');

It's still not a good idea, but it'll work.

发布评论

评论列表(0)

  1. 暂无评论