最新消息:雨落星辰是一个专注网站SEO优化、网站SEO诊断、搜索引擎研究、网络营销推广、网站策划运营及站长类的自媒体原创博客

javascript - moment.js isAfter performance - Stack Overflow

programmeradmin1浏览0评论

I have my dates converted to moment.js, and now I want to pare it with another date ('now' in this case).

Just a plain pare with a date object seems to be a lot faster than using moment.js isAfter function.

  • Will this simple pare work in all locales?
  • Am I missing something here?
  • Is there a very specific reason why isAfter seems to create a new moment object instead of taking a shortcut when it's a Date object?

All my dates are in UTC.

function executeTests() {
  isAfterTest();
  pareTest();
}

function isAfterTest() {
  console.time('isAfterTest');

  var now = new Date();
  var dateOfBirth = moment('2000-01-01');

  for (var i = 0; i < 50000; i++) {
    var x = dateOfBirth.isAfter(now);
  }

  console.timeEnd('isAfterTest');
}

function pareTest() {
  console.time('pareTest');

  var now = new Date();
  var dateOfBirth = moment('2000-01-01');

  for (var i = 0; i < 50000; i++) {
    var x = dateOfBirth > now;
  }

  console.timeEnd('pareTest');
}
<script src=".js/2.7.0/moment-with-langs.js"></script>
<button onclick="executeTests();">Run Test</button>

I have my dates converted to moment.js, and now I want to pare it with another date ('now' in this case).

Just a plain pare with a date object seems to be a lot faster than using moment.js isAfter function.

  • Will this simple pare work in all locales?
  • Am I missing something here?
  • Is there a very specific reason why isAfter seems to create a new moment object instead of taking a shortcut when it's a Date object?

All my dates are in UTC.

function executeTests() {
  isAfterTest();
  pareTest();
}

function isAfterTest() {
  console.time('isAfterTest');

  var now = new Date();
  var dateOfBirth = moment('2000-01-01');

  for (var i = 0; i < 50000; i++) {
    var x = dateOfBirth.isAfter(now);
  }

  console.timeEnd('isAfterTest');
}

function pareTest() {
  console.time('pareTest');

  var now = new Date();
  var dateOfBirth = moment('2000-01-01');

  for (var i = 0; i < 50000; i++) {
    var x = dateOfBirth > now;
  }

  console.timeEnd('pareTest');
}
<script src="http://cdnjs.cloudflare./ajax/libs/moment.js/2.7.0/moment-with-langs.js"></script>
<button onclick="executeTests();">Run Test</button>

Results:

isAfterTest: 3754.000ms (index):32
pareTest: 24.000ms 

See: http://jsfiddle/t4grs0p7/2/

Share Improve this question edited Jan 4, 2015 at 2:00 Mr. Polywhirl 48.9k12 gold badges93 silver badges145 bronze badges asked Aug 14, 2014 at 14:10 Dirk BoerDirk Boer 9,17313 gold badges71 silver badges123 bronze badges 6
  • is it even correct to pare a Date and a Moment using that operator? – goat Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 14:19
  • I made a jsperf for you. Feel free to tweak it if I didn't represent your test cases correctly. – ajp15243 Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 14:21
  • I have not really a clue goat, but it seems to work :| that's point. I'm wondering if I'm missing some essential stuff that I'm not taking into account atm. – Dirk Boer Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 14:22
  • @goat: it seems to work as far as I can see. the < operator seems to convert both objects to amount of ms since epoch through their valueOf() functions. – Dirk Boer Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 14:34
  • It's quite impressive how slow the isAfter method actually is! Definitely not useful in lists of data. I just thought I'd suggest you write up your result as an answer and accept it so that it might make things easier for Google and other future browsers who e across the question. Cheers – Zac Seth Commented Nov 7, 2014 at 10:35
 |  Show 1 more ment

1 Answer 1

Reset to default 4

Looking at the documentation http://momentjs./docs/ the isAfter method accepts different types of Date format:

moment().isAfter(Moment|String|Number|Date|Array);

This means it needs to do type checking and then convert it to a date object before running the calculation.

One way you could reduce this impact would be to pass in a Moment object as the parison date:

function isAfterTest() {
    console.time('isAfterTest');

    var now = moment();
    var dateOfBirth = moment('2000-01-01');

    for (var i = 0; i < 50000; i++) {
        var x = dateOfBirth.isAfter(now);
    }

    console.timeEnd('isAfterTest');
}

I created a fiddle to pare, but that doesn't seem to improve it much at all: http://jsfiddle/kmturley/t4grs0p7/7/

Looking at your version I believe you should be using valueOf() method to pare the values:

window.pareTest2 = function() {
    console.time('pareTest2');

    var now = moment().valueOf();
    var dateOfBirth = moment('2000-01-01').valueOf();

    for ( var i = 0; i < 50000; i++ )
        var x = dateOfBirth > now;

    console.timeEnd('pareTest2');
}

Here is a working example: http://jsfiddle/kmturley/t4grs0p7/8/

发布评论

评论列表(0)

  1. 暂无评论