Usually, when I want to check the type of an object (whether it's an array, a NodeList, or whatever), I use the following:
var arr = [] // I don't do this, but it's for the sake of the example
var obj = {}
obj.toString.apply(arr) // This works
The question is: why can I not do the following?
var arr = []
{}.toString.apply(arr) // Syntax error: Unexpected token .
I don't get where the syntax error is.
I can do something approaching with []
though, the following works:
var nodeList = document.getElementsByClassName('foo')
[].forEach.call(nodeList, function(bar) { console.log(bar) }) // Works
So... I'm confused.
Usually, when I want to check the type of an object (whether it's an array, a NodeList, or whatever), I use the following:
var arr = [] // I don't do this, but it's for the sake of the example
var obj = {}
obj.toString.apply(arr) // This works
The question is: why can I not do the following?
var arr = []
{}.toString.apply(arr) // Syntax error: Unexpected token .
I don't get where the syntax error is.
I can do something approaching with []
though, the following works:
var nodeList = document.getElementsByClassName('foo')
[].forEach.call(nodeList, function(bar) { console.log(bar) }) // Works
So... I'm confused.
Share Improve this question edited Apr 4, 2012 at 7:07 Florian Margaine asked Apr 4, 2012 at 7:00 Florian MargaineFlorian Margaine 60.9k15 gold badges93 silver badges120 bronze badges 3- you forgot () in toString() ? – kappa Commented Apr 4, 2012 at 7:02
- Nope, see @Ray Toal's answer. Adding the parenthesis would lead to a syntax error (Object has no method 'apply'). – Florian Margaine Commented Apr 4, 2012 at 7:13
- Ahh.. i didn't thought that, it's correct – kappa Commented Apr 4, 2012 at 7:19
1 Answer
Reset to default 16When you begin a line with {
JavaScript thinks it starts a block statement, not an object literal. Parenthesize it and you will be okay.