Let's say I have a base entity, ShopsEntity
, that has a bunch of fields along with a secret property:
@ObjectType()
class ShopsEntity {
@Field()
name: string;
@Field()
rating: string;
@Field()
secret: string;
}
I don't want the secret property to be serialised unless a user has a certain role defined through Nest Access Control (That module only allows for RoleGuards to be placed on the resolvers themselves, meaning I would need different routes per role).
So, following a request to the same endpoint with differing levels of authentication, an Admin would get:
{
"name": "name",
"rating": "rating",
"secret": "secret"
}
and a regular querying user would get:
{
"name": "name",
"rating": "rating"
}
Is there a declarative way in which I can do property-level security here, or is the best solution having separate DTO's for each level of security?
Let's say I have a base entity, ShopsEntity
, that has a bunch of fields along with a secret property:
@ObjectType()
class ShopsEntity {
@Field()
name: string;
@Field()
rating: string;
@Field()
secret: string;
}
I don't want the secret property to be serialised unless a user has a certain role defined through Nest Access Control (That module only allows for RoleGuards to be placed on the resolvers themselves, meaning I would need different routes per role).
So, following a request to the same endpoint with differing levels of authentication, an Admin would get:
{
"name": "name",
"rating": "rating",
"secret": "secret"
}
and a regular querying user would get:
{
"name": "name",
"rating": "rating"
}
Is there a declarative way in which I can do property-level security here, or is the best solution having separate DTO's for each level of security?
Share Improve this question edited Nov 12, 2019 at 9:13 Kim Kern 60.7k20 gold badges218 silver badges214 bronze badges asked Nov 11, 2019 at 10:01 stewartmcgownstewartmcgown 5264 silver badges16 bronze badges 2-
1
I use the
groups
feature of class-transformer, which I use for the serialization (or resp. class-validator for validation). I'm not sure if it interoperates with your access controll library. Have a look at github./typestack/… and stackoverflow./a/54057206/4694994 – Kim Kern Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 16:46 -
1
yep, looks like
groups
is the way to go! Integrates very nicely with access-control as I can reimport the roles used there. – stewartmcgown Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 22:56
1 Answer
Reset to default 6With class-transformer, you can use the groups
property to expose properties only for certain groups/roles:
import {Exclude, Expose} from "class-transformer";
@Exclude()
export class User {
@Expose({ groups: ["admin"] })
secret: string;
}
On how to use the ClassSerializerInterceptor
with groups, see the following answer.