Going to do my best at explaining what I am trying to do.

I have two models, mine and an api response I am receiving. When the items api response es in, I need to map it to my model and inserts all the items. This is simple of course. Heres the issue, I need to do so without really knowing what I am dealing with. My code will be passed in two strings, one of my models mapping path and one of the api response mapping path.

Here are the two paths

var myPath = "outputModel.items[].uniqueName"
var apiPath = "items[].name"

Basically FOR all items in apiPath, push into items in myPath and set to uniqueName

What it es down to is that my code has NO idea when two items need to be mapped, or even if they contain an array or simple field to field paths. They could even contain multiple arrays, like this:

******************** EXAMPLE *************************

var items = [
    {
        name: "Hammer",
        skus:[
            {num:"12345qwert"}
        ]
    },
    {
        name: "Bike",
        skus:[
            {num:"asdfghhj"},
            {num:"zxcvbn"}
        ]
    },
    {
        name: "Fork",
        skus:[
            {num:"0987dfgh"}
        ]
    }
]

var outputModel = {
    storeName: "",
    items: [
        {
            name: "",
            sku:""
        }
    ]
};


outputModel.items[].name = items[].name;
outputModel.items[].sku = items[].skus[].num;

************************ Here is the expected result of above

var result = {
    storeName: "",
    items: [
        {
            name: "Hammer",
            sku:"12345qwert"
        },
        {
            name: "Bike",
            sku:"asdfghhj"
        },
        {
            name: "Bike",
            sku:"zxcvbn"
        },
        {
            name: "Fork",
            sku:"0987dfgh"        }
    ]
};

I will be given a set of paths for EACH value to be mapped. In the case above, I was handed two sets of paths because I am mapping two values. It would have to traverse both sets of arrays to create the single array in my model.

Question - How can I dynamically detect arrays and move the data around properly no matter what the two model paths look like? Possible?

Going to do my best at explaining what I am trying to do.

I have two models, mine and an api response I am receiving. When the items api response es in, I need to map it to my model and inserts all the items. This is simple of course. Heres the issue, I need to do so without really knowing what I am dealing with. My code will be passed in two strings, one of my models mapping path and one of the api response mapping path.

Here are the two paths

var myPath = "outputModel.items[].uniqueName"
var apiPath = "items[].name"

Basically FOR all items in apiPath, push into items in myPath and set to uniqueName

What it es down to is that my code has NO idea when two items need to be mapped, or even if they contain an array or simple field to field paths. They could even contain multiple arrays, like this:

******************** EXAMPLE *************************

var items = [
    {
        name: "Hammer",
        skus:[
            {num:"12345qwert"}
        ]
    },
    {
        name: "Bike",
        skus:[
            {num:"asdfghhj"},
            {num:"zxcvbn"}
        ]
    },
    {
        name: "Fork",
        skus:[
            {num:"0987dfgh"}
        ]
    }
]

var outputModel = {
    storeName: "",
    items: [
        {
            name: "",
            sku:""
        }
    ]
};


outputModel.items[].name = items[].name;
outputModel.items[].sku = items[].skus[].num;

************************ Here is the expected result of above

var result = {
    storeName: "",
    items: [
        {
            name: "Hammer",
            sku:"12345qwert"
        },
        {
            name: "Bike",
            sku:"asdfghhj"
        },
        {
            name: "Bike",
            sku:"zxcvbn"
        },
        {
            name: "Fork",
            sku:"0987dfgh"        }
    ]
};

I will be given a set of paths for EACH value to be mapped. In the case above, I was handed two sets of paths because I am mapping two values. It would have to traverse both sets of arrays to create the single array in my model.

Question - How can I dynamically detect arrays and move the data around properly no matter what the two model paths look like? Possible?

• javascript
• arrays
• json
• string
• object

• In your last example, what are you expecting your output model to look like at the end? – S McCrohan Commented May 7, 2015 at 23:44
• Why not have just one structure to outputModel? Even if the only property avaiable is the name, it could be set as [{name: 'name'}]. Probably will be easier to work and mantain your applications with just one type structure. – Diego ZoracKy Commented May 7, 2015 at 23:44
• 2 @SMcCrohan I added the expected output. Note that I am ok if I need to run a piece of code 2 times because there is 2 sets of path like in example 2 – Rob Commented May 7, 2015 at 23:47
• 1 @Rob: The problem is that your notation is ambiguous once if contains unequal numbers of arrays on the left and on the right. It seems you're just taking the cartesian product? Please specify exactly how such cases should be handled. – Bergi Commented May 8, 2015 at 0:00
• 1 @Rob There is a small problem with outputModel.items[].sku = items[].skus[].num; becuase in the example you gave for the name Bike, the value of sku should be an array of nums not only the first one as it is in your example. Basically running a bit of regexp ( bleah ) on the paths you could define a proper semantic, otherwise you will run into a lot of inconsistencies. It is interesting but not doable unless you have a proper semantic for the attribution and routing system. I will try tomorrow to e with an actual answer. ( BTW hello @Bergi, long time no see :D ) – helly0d Commented May 13, 2015 at 23:25

5 Answers 5

So you have defined a little language to define some data addressing and manipulation rules. Let's think about an approach which will allow you to say

access(apiPath, function(value) { insert(myPath, value); }

The access function finds all the required items in apiPath, then calls back to insert, which inserts them into myPath. Our job is to write functions which create the access and insert functions; or, you could say, "pile" your little language into functions we can execute.

We will write "pilers" called make_accessor and make_inserter, as follows:

function make_accessor(program) {

  return function(obj, callback) {

    return function do_segment(obj, segments) {
      var start    = segments.shift()             // Get first segment
      var pieces   = start.match(/(\w+)(\[\])?/); // Get name and [] pieces
      var property = pieces[1];
      var isArray  = pieces[2];                   // [] on end
      obj          = obj[property];               // drill down

      if (!segments.length) {                     // last segment; callback
        if (isArray) {
          return obj.forEach(callback);
        } else {
          return callback(obj);
        }
      } else {                                    // more segments; recurse
        if (isArray) {                            // array--loop over elts
          obj.forEach(function(elt) { do_segment(elt, segments.slice()); });
        } else {
          do_segment(obj, segments.slice());      // scalar--continue
        }
      }
    }(obj, program.split('.'));
  };
}

We can now make an accessor by calling make_accessor('items[].name').

Next, let's write the inserter:

function make_inserter(program) {

  return function(obj, value) {

    return function do_segment(obj, segments) {
      var start    = segments.shift()             // Get first segment
      var pieces   = start.match(/(\w+)(\[\])?/); // Get name and [] pieces
      var property = pieces[1];
      var isArray  = pieces[2];                   // [] on end

      if (segments.length) {                      // more segments
        if (!obj[property]) {
          obj[property] = isArray ? [] : {};
        }
        do_segment(obj, segments.slice());
      } else {                                    // last segment
        obj[property] = value;
      }
    }(obj, program.split('.'));
  };
}

Now, you can express your whole logic as

access = make_accessor('items[].name');
insert = make_inserter('outputModel.items[].uniqueName');

access(apiPath, function(val) { insert(myPath, val); });

As mentioned in the ments, there is no strict definition of the input format, it is hard to do it with perfect error handling and handle all corner cases.

Here is my lengthy implementation that works on your sample, but might fail for some other cases:

function merge_objects(a, b) {
    var c = {}, attr;
    for (attr in a) { c[attr] = a[attr]; }
    for (attr in b) { c[attr] = b[attr]; }
    return c;
}


var id = {
    inner: null,
    name: "id",
    repr: "id",
    type: "map",
    exec: function (input) { return input; }
};

// set output field
function f(outp, mapper) {
    mapper = typeof mapper !== "undefined" ? mapper : id;
    var repr = "f("+outp+","+mapper.repr+")";
    var name = "f("+outp;
    return {
        inner: mapper,
        name: name,
        repr: repr,
        type: "map",
        clone: function(mapper) { return f(outp, mapper); },
        exec:
        function (input) {
            var out = {};
            out[outp] = mapper.exec(input);
            return out;
        }
    };
}

// set input field
function p(inp, mapper) {
    var repr = "p("+inp+","+mapper.repr+")";
    var name = "p("+inp;
    return {
        inner: mapper,
        name: name,
        repr: repr,
        type: mapper.type,
        clone: function(mapper) { return p(inp, mapper); },
        exec: function (input) {
            return mapper.exec(input[inp]);
        }
    };
}

// process array
function arr(mapper) {
    var repr = "arr("+mapper.repr+")";
    return {
        inner: mapper,
        name: "arr",
        repr: repr,
        type: mapper.type,
        clone: function(mapper) { return arr(mapper); },
        exec: function (input) {
            var out = [];
            for (var i=0; i<input.length; i++) {
                out.push(mapper.exec(input[i]));
            }
            return out;
        }
    };
}

function bine(m1, m2) {
    var type = (m1.type == "flatmap" || m2.type == "flatmap") ? "flatmap" : "map";
    var repr = "bine("+m1.repr+","+m2.repr+")";
    return {
        inner: null,
        repr: repr,
        type: type,
        name: "bine",
        exec:
        function (input) {
            var out1 = m1.exec(input);
            var out2 = m2.exec(input);
            var out, i, j;


            if (m1.type == "flatmap" && m2.type == "flatmap") {
                out = [];
                for (i=0; i<out1.length; i++) {
                    for (j=0; j<out2.length; j++) {
                        out.push(merge_objects(out1[i], out2[j]));
                    }
                }
                return out;
            }

            if (m1.type == "flatmap" && m2.type != "flatmap") {
                out = [];
                for (i=0; i<out1.length; i++) {
                    out.push(merge_objects(out1[i], out2));
                }
                return out;
            }

            if (m1.type != "flatmap" && m2.type == "flatmap") {
                out = [];
                for (i=0; i<out2.length; i++) {
                    out.push(merge_objects(out2[i], out1));
                }
                return out;
            }

            return merge_objects(out1, out2);
        }
    };
}

function flatmap(mapper) {
    var repr = "flatmap("+mapper.repr+")";
    return {
        inner: mapper,
        repr: repr,
        type: "flatmap",
        name: "flatmap",
        clone: function(mapper) { return flatmap(mapper); },
        exec:
        function (input) {
            var out = [];
            for (var i=0; i<input.length; i++) {
                out.push(mapper.exec(input[i]));
            }
            return out;
        }
    };
}



function split(s, t) {
    var i = s.indexOf(t);

    if (i == -1) return null;
    else {
        return [s.slice(0, i), s.slice(i+2, s.length)];
    }
}

function pile_one(inr, outr) {
    inr = (inr.charAt(0) == ".") ? inr.slice(1, inr.length) : inr;
    outr = (outr.charAt(0) == ".") ? outr.slice(1, outr.length) : outr;

    var box = split(inr, "[]");
    var box2 = split(outr, "[]");
    var m, ps, fs, i, j;

    if (box == null && box2 == null) { // no array!
        m = id;

        ps = inr.split(".");
        fs = outr.split(".");

        for (i=0; i<fs.length; i++) { m = f(fs[i], m); }
        for (j=0; j<ps.length; j++) { m = p(ps[j], m); }

        return m;
    }

    if (box != null && box2 != null) { // array on both sides
        m = arr(pile_one(box[1], box2[1]));

        ps = box[0].split(".");
        fs = box[0].split(".");

        for (i=0; i<fs.length; i++) { m = f(fs[i], m); }
        for (j=0; j<ps.length; j++) { m = p(ps[j], m); }

        return m;
    }

    if (box != null && box2 == null) { // flatmap
        m = flatmap(pile_one(box[1], outr));

        ps = box[0].split(".");

        for (j=0; j<ps.length; j++) { m = p(ps[j], m); }

        return m;
    }

    return null;
}

function merge_rules(m1, m2) {
    if (m1 == null) return m2;
    if (m2 == null) return m1;

    if (m1.name == m2.name && m1.inner != null) {
        return m1.clone(merge_rules(m1.inner, m2.inner));
    } else {
        return bine(m1, m2);
    }

}

var input = {
    store: "myStore",
    items: [
        {name: "Hammer", skus:[{num:"12345qwert"}]},
        {name: "Bike", skus:[{num:"asdfghhj"}, {num:"zxcvbn"}]},
        {name: "Fork", skus:[{num:"0987dfgh"}]}
    ]
};

var m1 = pile_one("items[].name", "items[].name");
var m2 = pile_one("items[].skus[].num", "items[].sku");
var m3 = pile_one("store", "storeName");
var m4 = merge_rules(m3,merge_rules(m1, m2));
var out = m4.exec(input);


alert(JSON.stringify(out));

I have borrowed earlier answer and made improvements so as to solve both your examples and this should be generic. Though if you plan to run this sequencially with 2 sets of inputs, then the behavior will be as I have outlined in my ments to your original question.

    var apiObj = {
    items: [{
        name: "Hammer",
        skus: [{
            num: "12345qwert"
        }]
    }, {
        name: "Bike",
        skus: [{
            num: "asdfghhj"
        }, {
            num: "zxcvbn"
        }]
    }, {
        name: "Fork",
        skus: [{
            num: "0987dfgh"
        }]
    }]
};

var myObj = { //Previously has values
    storeName: "",
    items: [{
        uniqueName: ""
    }],
    outputModel: {
        items: [{
            name: "Hammer"
        }]
    }
};

/** Also works with this **
var myPath = "outputModel.items[].uniqueName";
var apiPath = "items[].name";
*/
var myPath = "outputModel.items[].sku";
var apiPath = "items[].skus[].num";

function make_accessor(program) {

    return function (obj, callback) {
        (function do_segment(obj, segments) {
            var start = segments.shift() // Get first segment
            var pieces = start.match(/(\w+)(\[\])?/); // Get name and [] pieces
            var property = pieces[1];
            var isArray = pieces[2]; // [] on end
            obj = obj[property]; // drill down

            if (!segments.length) { // last segment; callback
                if (isArray) {
                    return obj.forEach(callback);
                } else {
                    return callback(obj);
                }
            } else { // more segments; recurse
                if (isArray) { // array--loop over elts
                    obj.forEach(function (elt) {
                        do_segment(elt, segments.slice());
                    });
                } else {
                    do_segment(obj, segments.slice()); // scalar--continue
                }
            }
        })(obj, program.split('.'));
    };
}

function make_inserter(program) {

    return function (obj, value) {
        (function do_segment(obj, segments) {
            var start = segments.shift() // Get first segment
            var pieces = start.match(/(\w+)(\[\])?/); // Get name and [] pieces
            var property = pieces[1];
            var isArray = pieces[2]; // [] on end
            if (segments.length) { // more segments
                if (!obj[property]) {
                    obj[property] = isArray ? [] : {};
                }
                do_segment(obj[property], segments.slice());
            } else { // last segment
                if (Array.isArray(obj)) {
                    var addedInFor = false;
                    for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; i++) {
                        if (!(property in obj[i])) {
                            obj[i][property] = value;
                            addedInFor = true;
                            break;
                        }
                    }
                    if (!addedInFor) {
                        var entry = {};
                        entry[property] = value;
                        obj.push(entry);
                    }
                } else obj[property] = value;
            }
        })(obj, program.split('.'));
    };
}

access = make_accessor(apiPath);
insert = make_inserter(myPath);

access(apiObj, function (val) {
    insert(myObj, val);
});

console.log(myObj);

(old solution: https://jsfiddle/d7by0ywy/):

Here is my new generalized solution when you know the two objects to process in advance (called inp and out here). If you don't know them in advance you can use the trick in the old solution to assign the objects on both sides of = to inp and out (https://jsfiddle/uxdney3L/3/).

Restrictions: There has to be the same amount of arrays on both sides and an array has to contain objects. Othewise it would be ambiguous, you would have to e up with a better grammar to express rules (or why don't you have functions instead of rules?) if you want it to be more sophisticated.

Example of ambiguity: out.items[].sku=inp[].skus[].num Do you assign an array of the values of num to sku or do you assign an array of objects with the num property?

Data:

rules = [
  'out.items[].name=inp[].name',
  'out.items[].sku[].num=inp[].skus[].num'
];

inp = [{
    'name': 'Hammer',
    'skus':[{'num':'12345qwert','test':'ignore'}]
  },{
    'name': 'Bike',
    'skus':[{'num':'asdfghhj'},{'num':'zxcvbn'}]
  },{
    'name': 'Fork',
    'skus':[{'num':'0987dfgh'}]
}];

Program:

function process() {
  if (typeof out == 'undefined') {
    out = {};
  }
  var j, r;
  for (j = 0; j < rules.length; j++) {
    r = rules[j].split('=');
    if (r.length != 2) {
      console.log('invalid rule: symbol "=" is expected exactly once');
    } else if (r[0].substr(0, 3) != 'out' || r[1].substr(0, 3) != 'inp') {
      console.log('invalid rule: expected "inp...=out..."');
    } else {
      processRule(r[0].substr(3).split('[]'), r[1].substr(3).split('[]'), 0, inp, out);
    }
  }
}

function processRule(l, r, n, i, o) { // left, right, index, in, out
  var t = r[n].split('.');
  for (var j = 0; j < t.length; j++) {
    if (t[j] != '') {
      i = i[t[j]];
    }
  }
  t = l[n].split('.');
  if (n < l.length - 1) {
    for (j = 0; j < t.length - 1; j++) {
      if (t[j] != '') {
        if (typeof o[t[j]] == 'undefined') {
          o[t[j]] = {};
        }
        o = o[t[j]];
      }
    }
    if (typeof o[t[j]] == 'undefined') {
      o[t[j]] = [];
    }
    o = o[t[j]];
    for (j = 0; j < i.length; j++) {
      if (typeof o[j] == 'undefined') {
          o[j] = {};
      }
      processRule(l, r, n + 1, i[j], o[j]);
    }
  } else {
    for (j = 0; j < t.length - 1; j++) {
      if (t[j] != '') {
        if (typeof o[t[j]] == 'undefined') {
          o[t[j]] = {};
        }
        o = o[t[j]];
      }
    }
    o[t[j]] = i;
  }
}

process();
console.log(out);

Well, an interesting problem. Programmatically constructing nested objects from a property accessor string (or the reverse) isn't much of a problem, even doing so with multiple descriptors in parallel. Where it does get plicated are arrays, which require iteration; and that isn't as funny any more when it gets to different levels on setter and getter sides and multiple descriptor strings in parallel.

So first we need to distinguish the array levels of each accessor description in the script, and parse the text:

function parse(script) {
    return script.split(/\s*[;\r\n]+\s*/g).map(function(line) {
        var assignment = line.split(/\s*=\s*/);
        return assignment.length == 2 ? assignment : null; // console.warn ???
    }).filter(Boolean).map(function(as) {
        as = as.map(function(accessor) {
            var parts = accessor.split("[]").map(function(part) {
                return part.split(".");
            });
            for (var i=1; i<parts.length; i++) {
                // assert(parts[i][0] == "")
                var prev = parts[i-1][parts[i-1].length-1];
                parts[i][0] = prev.replace(/s$/, ""); // singular :-)
            }
            return parts;
        });
        if (as[0].length == 1 && as[1].length > 1) // getter contains array but setter does not
            as[0].unshift(["output"]); // implicitly return array (but better throw an error)
        return {setter:as[0], getter:as[1]};
    });
}

With that, the textual input can be made into a usable data structure, and now looks like this:

[{"setter":[["outputModel","items"],["item","name"]],
  "getter":[["items"],["item","name"]]},
 {"setter":[["outputModel","items"],["item","sku"]],
  "getter":[["items"],["item","skus"],["sku","num"]]}]

The getters already transform nicely into nested loops like

for (item of items)
    for (sku of item.skus)
        … sku.num …;

and that's exactly where we are going to. Each of those rules is relatively easy to process, copying properties on objects and iterating array for array, but here es our most crucial issue: We have multiple rules. The basic solution when we deal with iterating multiple arrays is to create their cartesian product and this is indeed what we will need. However, we want to restrict this a lot - instead of creating every bination of all names and all nums in the input, we want to group them by the item that they e from.

To do so, we'll build some kind of prefix tree for our output structure that'll contain generators of objects, each of those recursivley being a tree for the respective output substructure again.

function multiGroupBy(arr, by) {
    return arr.reduce(function(res, x) {
        var p = by(x);
        (res[p] || (res[p] = [])).push(x);
        return res;
    }, {});
}
function group(rules) {
    var paths = multiGroupBy(rules, function(rule) {
        return rule.setter[0].slice(1).join(".");
    });
    var res = [];
    for (var path in paths) {
        var pathrules = paths[path],
            array = [];
        for (var i=0; i<pathrules.length; i++) {
            var rule = pathrules[i];
            var b = 1 + rule.getter.length - rule.setter.length;
            if (rule.setter.length > 1) // its an array
                array.push({
                    generator: rule.getter.slice(0, b),
                    next: {
                        setter: rule.setter.slice(1),
                        getter: rule.getter.slice(b)
                    }
                })
            else if (rule.getter.length == 1 && i==0)
                res.push({
                    set: rule.setter[0],
                    get: rule.getter[0]
                });
            else
                console.error("invalid:", rule);
        }
        if (array.length)
            res.push({
                set: pathrules[0].setter[0],
                cross: product(array)
            });
    }
    return res;
}
function product(pathsetters) {
    var groups = multiGroupBy(pathsetters, function(pathsetter) {
        return pathsetter.generator[0].slice(1).join(".");
    });
    var res = [];
    for (var genstart in groups) {
        var creators = groups[genstart],
            nexts = [],
            nests = [];
        for (var i=0; i<creators.length; i++) {
            if (creators[i].generator.length == 1)
                nexts.push(creators[i].next);
            else
                nests.push({path:creators[i].path, generator: creators[i].generator.slice(1), next:creators[i].next});
        }
        res.push({
            get: creators[0].generator[0],
            cross: group(nexts).concat(product(nests))
        });
    }
    return res;
}

Now, our ruleset group(parse(script)) looks like this:

[{
    "set": ["outputModel","items"],
    "cross": [{
        "get": ["items"],
        "cross": [{
            "set": ["item","name"],
            "get": ["item","name"]
        }, {
            "get": ["item","skus"],
            "cross": [{
                "set": ["item","sku"],
                "get": ["sku","num"]
            }]
        }]
    }]
}]

and that is a structure we can actually work with, as it now clearly conveys the intention on how to match together all those nested arrays and the objects within them. Let's dynamically interpret this, building an output for a given input:

function transform(structure, input, output) {
    for (var i=0; i<structure.length; i++) {
        output = assign(output, structure[i].set.slice(1), getValue(structure[i], input));
    }
    return output;
}
function retrieve(val, props) {
    return props.reduce(function(o, p) { return o[p]; }, val);
}
function assign(obj, props, val) {
    if (!obj)
        if (!props.length) return val;
        else obj = {};
    for (var j=0, o=obj; j<props.length-1 && o!=null && o[props[j]]; o=o[props[j++]]);
    obj[props[j]] = props.slice(j+1).reduceRight(function(val, p) {
        var o = {};
        o[p] = val;
        return o;
    }, val);
    return obj;
}
function getValue(descriptor, input) {
    if (descriptor.get) // && !cross
        return retrieve(input, descriptor.get.slice(1));
    var arr = [];
    descriptor.cross.reduce(function horror(next, d) {
        if (descriptor.set)
            return function (inp, cb) {
                next(inp, function(res){
                    cb(assign(res, d.set.slice(1), getValue(d, inp)));
                });
            };
        else // its a crosser
            return function(inp, cb) {
                var g = retrieve(inp, d.get.slice(1)),
                    e = d.cross.reduce(horror, next)
                for (var i=0; i<g.length; i++)
                    e(g[i], cb);
            };
    }, function innermost(inp, cb) {
        cb(); // start to create an item
    })(input, function(res) {
        arr.push(res); // store the item
    });
    return arr;
}

And this does indeed work with

var result = transform(group(parse(script)), items); // your expected result

But we can do better, and much more performant:

function pile(structure) {
    function make(descriptor) {
        if (descriptor.get)
            return {inputName: descriptor.get[0], output: descriptor.get.join(".") };

        var outputName = descriptor.set[descriptor.set.length-1];
        var loops = descriptor.cross.reduce(function horror(next, descriptor) {
            if (descriptor.set)
                return function(it, cb) {
                    return next(it, function(res){
                        res.push(descriptor)
                        return cb(res);
                    });
                };
            else // its a crosser
                return function(it, cb) {
                    var arrName = descriptor.get[descriptor.get.length-1],
                        itName = String.fromCharCode(it);
                    var inner = descriptor.cross.reduce(horror, next)(it+1, cb);
                    return {
                        inputName: descriptor.get[0],
                        statement:  (descriptor.get.length>1 ? "var "+arrName+" = "+descriptor.get.join(".")+";\n" : "")+
                                    "for (var "+itName+" = 0; "+itName+" < "+arrName+".length; "+itName+"++) {\n"+
                                    "var "+inner.inputName+" = "+arrName+"["+itName+"];\n"+
                                    inner.statement+
                                    "}\n"
                    };
                };
        }, function(_, cb) {
            return cb([]);
        })(105, function(res) {
            var item = joinSetters(res);
            return {
                inputName: item.inputName,
                statement: (item.statement||"")+outputName+".push("+item.output+");\n"
            };
        });
        return {
            statement: "var "+outputName+" = [];\n"+loops.statement,
            output: outputName,
            inputName: loops.inputName
        };
    }
    function joinSetters(descriptors) {
        if (descriptors.length == 1 && descriptors[0].set.length == 1)
            return make(descriptors[0]);
        var paths = multiGroupBy(descriptors, function(d){ return d.set[1] || console.error("multiple assignments on "+d.set[0], d); });
        var statements = [],
            inputName;
        var props = Object.keys(paths).map(function(p) {
            var d = joinSetters(paths[p].map(function(d) {
                var names = d.set.slice(1);
                names[0] = d.set[0]+"_"+names[0];
                return {set:names, get:d.get, cross:d.cross};
            }));
            inputName = d.inputName;
            if (d.statement)
                statements.push(d.statement)
            return JSON.stringify(p) + ": " + d.output;
        });
        return {
            inputName: inputName,
            statement: statements.join(""),
            output: "{"+props.join(",")+"}"
        };
    }
    var code = joinSetters(structure);
    return new Function(code.inputName, code.statement+"return "+code.output+";");
}

So here is what you will get in the end:

> var example = pile(group(parse("outputModel.items[].name = items[].name;outputModel.items[].sku = items[].skus[].num;")))
function(items) {
    var outputModel_items = []; 
    for (var i = 0; i < items.length; i++) {
        var item = items[i];
        var skus = item.skus;
        for (var j = 0; j < skus.length; j++) {
            var sku = skus[j];
            outputModel_items.push({"name": item.name,"sku": sku.num});
        }
    }
    return {"items": outputModel_items};
}
> var flatten = pile(group(parse("as[]=bss[][]")))
function(bss) {
    var as = []; 
    for (var i = 0; i < bss.length; i++) {
        var bs = bss[i];
        for (var j = 0; j < bs.length; j++) {
            var b = bs[j];
            as.push(b);
        }
    }
    return as;
}
> var parallelRecords = pile(group(parse("x.as[]=y[].a; x.bs[]=y[].b")))
function(y) {
    var x_as = []; 
    for (var i = 0; i < y.length; i++) {
        var y = y[i];
        x_as.push(y.a);
    }
    var x_bs = []; 
    for (var i = 0; i < y.length; i++) {
        var y = y[i];
        x_bs.push(y.b);
    }
    return {"as": x_as,"bs": x_bs};
}

And now you can easily pass your input data to that dynamically created function and it will be transformed quite fast :-)