权限没有，则隐藏 function forum_list_access_filter($forumlist, $gid, $allow = 'allowread') { global $grouplist; if (empty($forumlist)) return array(); if (1 == $gid) return $forumlist; $forumlist_filter = $forumlist; $group = $grouplist[$gid]; foreach ($forumlist_filter as $fid => $forum) { if (empty($forum['accesson']) && empty($group[$allow]) || !empty($forum['accesson']) && empty($forum['accesslist'][$gid][$allow])) { unset($forumlist_filter[$fid]); } unset($forumlist_filter[$fid]['accesslist']); } return $forumlist_filter; } function forum_filter_moduid($moduids) { $moduids = trim($moduids); if (empty($moduids)) return ''; $arr = explode(',', $moduids); $r = array(); foreach ($arr as $_uid) { $_uid = intval($_uid); $_user = user_read($_uid); if (empty($_user)) continue; if ($_user['gid'] > 4) continue; $r[] = $_uid; } return implode(',', $r); } function forum_safe_info($forum) { //unset($forum['moduids']); return $forum; } function forum_filter($forumlist) { foreach ($forumlist as &$val) { unset($val['brief'], $val['announcement'], $val['seo_title'], $val['seo_keywords'], $val['create_date_fmt'], $val['icon_url'], $val['modlist']); } return $forumlist; } function forum_format_url($forum) { global $conf; if (0 == $forum['category']) { // 列表URL $url = url('list-' . $forum['fid'], '', FALSE); } elseif (1 == $forum['category']) { // 频道 $url = url('category-' . $forum['fid'], '', FALSE); } elseif (2 == $forum['category']) { // 单页 $url = url('read-' . trim($forum['brief']), '', FALSE); } if ($conf['url_rewrite_on'] > 1 && $forum['well_alias']) { if (0 == $forum['category'] || 1 == $forum['category']) { $url = url($forum['well_alias'], '', FALSE); } elseif (2 == $forum['category']) { // 单页 $url = ($forum['threads'] && $forum['brief']) ? url($forum['well_alias'] . '-' . trim($forum['brief']), '', FALSE) : url($forum['well_alias'], '', FALSE); } } return $url; } function well_forum_alias() { $forumlist = forum_list_cache(); if (empty($forumlist)) return ''; $key = 'forum-alias'; static $cache = array(); if (isset($cache[$key])) return $cache[$key]; $cache[$key] = array(); foreach ($forumlist as $val) { if ($val['well_alias']) $cache[$key][$val['fid']] = $val['well_alias']; } return array_flip($cache[$key]); } function well_forum_alias_cache() { global $conf; $key = 'forum-alias-cache'; static $cache = array(); // 用静态变量只能在当前 request 生命周期缓存，跨进程需要再加一层缓存：redis/memcached/xcache/apc if (isset($cache[$key])) return $cache[$key]; if ('mysql' == $conf['cache']['type']) { $arr = well_forum_alias(); } else { $arr = cache_get($key); if (NULL === $arr) { $arr = well_forum_alias(); !empty($arr) AND cache_set($key, $arr); } } $cache[$key] = empty($arr) ? '' : $arr; return $cache[$key]; } ?>javascript - RequireJS vs Dojo 1.7 AMD - Stack Overflow

科技改变生活-雨落星辰 - 所有的伟大,都源于一个勇敢的开始

    最新消息：雨落星辰是一个专注网站SEO优化、网站SEO诊断、搜索引擎研究、网络营销推广、网站策划运营及站长类的自媒体原创博客
    你的位置： 首页>programmer>javascript - RequireJS vs Dojo 1.7 AMD - Stack Overflow

    javascript - RequireJS vs Dojo 1.7 AMD - Stack Overflow

    programmeradmin8浏览0评论

    Bit of an abstract question, but I'm surprised I'm not finding it already:

    Now that Dojo has gone all AMD with 1.7, How does it pare to RequireJS, Lab, Head, etc...

    Edit: I realize lab and head aren't AMD loaders. To clarify:

    I'm liking how Dojo is splitting it's core out into small, concise, single-purpose modules. (I'd assume these module would work with any AMD loader now, though I haven't tested that) This leaves dojo.js itself barely more than an AMD loader.

    So the question is: As an AMD loader, how does Dojo stack up. In terms of how well if follows the spec, speed, size, efficiency, whatever. It's the new kid in a very heated topic it seems, but I've heard surprisingly little about it.

    Bit of an abstract question, but I'm surprised I'm not finding it already:

    Now that Dojo has gone all AMD with 1.7, How does it pare to RequireJS, Lab, Head, etc...

    Edit: I realize lab and head aren't AMD loaders. To clarify:

    I'm liking how Dojo is splitting it's core out into small, concise, single-purpose modules. (I'd assume these module would work with any AMD loader now, though I haven't tested that) This leaves dojo.js itself barely more than an AMD loader.

    So the question is: As an AMD loader, how does Dojo stack up. In terms of how well if follows the spec, speed, size, efficiency, whatever. It's the new kid in a very heated topic it seems, but I've heard surprisingly little about it.

    • javascript
    • dojo
    • requirejs
    • amd
    Share Improve this question edited Mar 31, 2012 at 1:00 nicholas asked Mar 30, 2012 at 18:57 nicholasnicholas 14.6k22 gold badges86 silver badges149 bronze badges 1
    • Great question... I've yet to see performance data. It would also be interesting to pare them based on their various optimization tools. FWIW, requirejs was the work of @jrburke, a Dojo mitter who did some excellent work on the original loader and cross-domain module loading. AMD was sort of the next generation loader for Dojo. In my experience, cross-loader patibility isn't all that good yet. There are some things that may need to be nailed down in the spec, such as the behavior of the immediate require() call, also inconsistencies in how plugin modules are handled. – peller Commented Apr 3, 2012 at 2:22
    Add a ment  | 

    1 Answer 1

    Reset to default 9

    4 different things.

    Dojo is a toolkit which has been converted to use AMD and ships with an implementation of an AMD loader and optimization tools. requirejs is a loader which also implements AMD and may be used with various toolkits (Dojo support is still lacking) There are some other AMD implementations like curl.js. I don't believe lab.js or head.js implement AMD

    If you're asking how the AMD implementations differ or how consistent the spec is... excellent question. If you're asking about the pros and cons of an AMD implementation vs non-AMD, that requires a different matrix. One such parison can be found on SO.

    与本文相关的文章

    发布评论

    评论列表(0)

    1. 暂无评论