最新消息:雨落星辰是一个专注网站SEO优化、网站SEO诊断、搜索引擎研究、网络营销推广、网站策划运营及站长类的自媒体原创博客

javascript - How to import into properties using ES6 module syntax (destructing)? - Stack Overflow

programmeradmin0浏览0评论
import utilityRemove from 'lodash/array/remove';
import utilityAssign from 'lodash/object/assign';
import utilityRandom from 'lodash/number/random';
import utilityFind from 'lodash/collection/find';
import utilityWhere from 'lodash/collection/where';

let util;

util = {};

util.remove = utilityRemove;
util.assign = utilityAssign;
util.random = utilityRandom;
util.find = utilityFind;
util.where = utilityWhere;

Is there a better way to do the above using ES6 module system?

import utilityRemove from 'lodash/array/remove';
import utilityAssign from 'lodash/object/assign';
import utilityRandom from 'lodash/number/random';
import utilityFind from 'lodash/collection/find';
import utilityWhere from 'lodash/collection/where';

let util;

util = {};

util.remove = utilityRemove;
util.assign = utilityAssign;
util.random = utilityRandom;
util.find = utilityFind;
util.where = utilityWhere;

Is there a better way to do the above using ES6 module system?

Share Improve this question asked Aug 20, 2015 at 17:30 GajusGajus 74k80 gold badges297 silver badges472 bronze badges 6
  • I really wonder why you are not doing import util from 'lodash' or import {remove, assign, random, find, where} from 'lodash'? – Bergi Commented Aug 20, 2015 at 17:55
  • Both approaches would import the entire library (600KB). Importing individual modules adds up to only about 80KB. – Gajus Commented Aug 20, 2015 at 18:00
  • Are you re-exporting util or using it inside this same file. If you are re-exporting it, then you should use ES6 syntax to do that and skip making an object entirely. – loganfsmyth Commented Aug 20, 2015 at 18:01
  • Just use a next-generation bundler then :-) – Bergi Commented Aug 20, 2015 at 18:02
  • @Bergi Thats very nice. You should reach out to people at Babel, if you haven't already. – Gajus Commented Aug 20, 2015 at 18:08
 |  Show 1 more ment

2 Answers 2

Reset to default 5

If these are the only symbols in your module, I would shorten the names and use the new object shorthand to do:

import remove from 'lodash/array/remove';
import assign from 'lodash/object/assign';
import random from 'lodash/number/random';
import find from 'lodash/collection/find';
import where from 'lodash/collection/where';

let util = {
  remove,
  assign,
  random,
  find,
  where
};

If that could cause conflicts, you might consider moving this section to its own module. Being able to replace the lodash methods while testing could potentially be useful.

Since each symbol es from a different module, you can't bine the imports, unless lodash provides a bined import module for that purpose.

If you're simply exporting a symbol without using it, you can also consider this syntax:

export remove from 'lodash/array/remove';
export assign from 'lodash/object/assign';

Which, to anyone importing and using your module, will appear as:

import {remove, assign} from 'your-module';

You can do this in a utils module:

//utils.js

export remove from 'lodash/array/remove';
export assign from 'lodash/object/assign';
export random from 'lodash/number/random';
export find from 'lodash/collection/find';
export where from 'lodash/collection/where';

and use it like this:

import * as util from './utils';

...

util.random();
发布评论

评论列表(0)

  1. 暂无评论