te')); return $arr; } /* 遍历用户所有主题 * @param $uid 用户ID * @param int $page 页数 * @param int $pagesize 每页记录条数 * @param bool $desc 排序方式 TRUE降序 FALSE升序 * @param string $key 返回的数组用那一列的值作为 key * @param array $col 查询哪些列 */ function thread_tid_find_by_uid($uid, $page = 1, $pagesize = 1000, $desc = TRUE, $key = 'tid', $col = array()) { if (empty($uid)) return array(); $orderby = TRUE == $desc ? -1 : 1; $arr = thread_tid__find($cond = array('uid' => $uid), array('tid' => $orderby), $page, $pagesize, $key, $col); return $arr; } // 遍历栏目下tid 支持数组 $fid = array(1,2,3) function thread_tid_find_by_fid($fid, $page = 1, $pagesize = 1000, $desc = TRUE) { if (empty($fid)) return array(); $orderby = TRUE == $desc ? -1 : 1; $arr = thread_tid__find($cond = array('fid' => $fid), array('tid' => $orderby), $page, $pagesize, 'tid', array('tid', 'verify_date')); return $arr; } function thread_tid_delete($tid) { if (empty($tid)) return FALSE; $r = thread_tid__delete(array('tid' => $tid)); return $r; } function thread_tid_count() { $n = thread_tid__count(); return $n; } // 统计用户主题数 大数量下严谨使用非主键统计 function thread_uid_count($uid) { $n = thread_tid__count(array('uid' => $uid)); return $n; } // 统计栏目主题数 大数量下严谨使用非主键统计 function thread_fid_count($fid) { $n = thread_tid__count(array('fid' => $fid)); return $n; } ?>javascript - Node.js, multi-threading and Socket.io - Stack Overflow
最新消息:雨落星辰是一个专注网站SEO优化、网站SEO诊断、搜索引擎研究、网络营销推广、网站策划运营及站长类的自媒体原创博客

javascript - Node.js, multi-threading and Socket.io - Stack Overflow

programmeradmin3浏览0评论

I'm looking to get Socket.io to work multi-threaded with native load balancing ("cluster") in Node.js v.0.6.0 and later.

From what I understand, Socket.io uses Redis to store its internal data. My understanding is this: instead of spawning a new Redis instance for every worker, we want to force the workers to use the same Redis instance as the master. Thus, connection data would be shared across all workers.

Something like this in the master:

RedisInstance = new io.RedisStore;

The we must somehow pass RedisInstance to the workers and do the following:

io.set('store', RedisInstance);

Inspired by this implementation using the old, 3rd party cluster module, I have the following non-working implementation:

var cluster = require('cluster');
var http = require('http');
var numCPUs = require('os').cpus().length;

if (cluster.isMaster) {
  // Fork workers.
  for (var i = 0; i < numCPUs; i++) {
    cluster.fork();
  }

  var sio = require('socket.io')
  , RedisStore = sio.RedisStore
  , io = sio.listen(8080, options);

  // Somehow pass this information to the workers
  io.set('store', new RedisStore);

} else {
  // Do the work here
  io.sockets.on('connection', function (socket) {
    socket.on('chat', function (data) {
      socket.broadcast.emit('chat', data);
    })
  });
}

Thoughts? I might be going pletely in the wrong direction, anybody can point to some ideas?

I'm looking to get Socket.io to work multi-threaded with native load balancing ("cluster") in Node.js v.0.6.0 and later.

From what I understand, Socket.io uses Redis to store its internal data. My understanding is this: instead of spawning a new Redis instance for every worker, we want to force the workers to use the same Redis instance as the master. Thus, connection data would be shared across all workers.

Something like this in the master:

RedisInstance = new io.RedisStore;

The we must somehow pass RedisInstance to the workers and do the following:

io.set('store', RedisInstance);

Inspired by this implementation using the old, 3rd party cluster module, I have the following non-working implementation:

var cluster = require('cluster');
var http = require('http');
var numCPUs = require('os').cpus().length;

if (cluster.isMaster) {
  // Fork workers.
  for (var i = 0; i < numCPUs; i++) {
    cluster.fork();
  }

  var sio = require('socket.io')
  , RedisStore = sio.RedisStore
  , io = sio.listen(8080, options);

  // Somehow pass this information to the workers
  io.set('store', new RedisStore);

} else {
  // Do the work here
  io.sockets.on('connection', function (socket) {
    socket.on('chat', function (data) {
      socket.broadcast.emit('chat', data);
    })
  });
}

Thoughts? I might be going pletely in the wrong direction, anybody can point to some ideas?

Share Improve this question asked Dec 19, 2011 at 15:18 David ChouinardDavid Chouinard 6,8468 gold badges46 silver badges64 bronze badges 1
  • 1 I wonder what approach you end up using. – mvbl fst Commented Jun 3, 2013 at 19:04
Add a ment  | 

1 Answer 1

Reset to default 11

Actually your code should look like this:

var cluster = require('cluster');
var http = require('http');
var numCPUs = require('os').cpus().length;

if (cluster.isMaster) {
  // Fork workers.
  for (var i = 0; i < numCPUs; i++) {
    cluster.fork();
  }
} else {
  var sio = require('socket.io')
  , RedisStore = sio.RedisStore
  , io = sio.listen(8080, options);

  // Somehow pass this information to the workers
  io.set('store', new RedisStore);

  // Do the work here
  io.sockets.on('connection', function (socket) {
    socket.on('chat', function (data) {
      socket.broadcast.emit('chat', data);
    })
  });
}

Another option is to open Socket.IO to listen on multiple ports and have something like HAProxy load-balance stuff. Anyway you know the most important thing: using RedisStore to scale outside a process!

Resources:

http://nodejs/docs/latest/api/cluster.html
How can I scale socket.io?
How to reuse redis connection in socket.io?
Node: Scale socket.io / nowjs - scale across different instances
http://delicious./alessioaw/socket.io

发布评论

评论列表(0)

  1. 暂无评论