te')); return $arr; } /* 遍历用户所有主题 * @param $uid 用户ID * @param int $page 页数 * @param int $pagesize 每页记录条数 * @param bool $desc 排序方式 TRUE降序 FALSE升序 * @param string $key 返回的数组用那一列的值作为 key * @param array $col 查询哪些列 */ function thread_tid_find_by_uid($uid, $page = 1, $pagesize = 1000, $desc = TRUE, $key = 'tid', $col = array()) { if (empty($uid)) return array(); $orderby = TRUE == $desc ? -1 : 1; $arr = thread_tid__find($cond = array('uid' => $uid), array('tid' => $orderby), $page, $pagesize, $key, $col); return $arr; } // 遍历栏目下tid 支持数组 $fid = array(1,2,3) function thread_tid_find_by_fid($fid, $page = 1, $pagesize = 1000, $desc = TRUE) { if (empty($fid)) return array(); $orderby = TRUE == $desc ? -1 : 1; $arr = thread_tid__find($cond = array('fid' => $fid), array('tid' => $orderby), $page, $pagesize, 'tid', array('tid', 'verify_date')); return $arr; } function thread_tid_delete($tid) { if (empty($tid)) return FALSE; $r = thread_tid__delete(array('tid' => $tid)); return $r; } function thread_tid_count() { $n = thread_tid__count(); return $n; } // 统计用户主题数 大数量下严谨使用非主键统计 function thread_uid_count($uid) { $n = thread_tid__count(array('uid' => $uid)); return $n; } // 统计栏目主题数 大数量下严谨使用非主键统计 function thread_fid_count($fid) { $n = thread_tid__count(array('fid' => $fid)); return $n; } ?>javascript - Array reduce function with async await - Stack Overflow
最新消息:雨落星辰是一个专注网站SEO优化、网站SEO诊断、搜索引擎研究、网络营销推广、网站策划运营及站长类的自媒体原创博客

javascript - Array reduce function with async await - Stack Overflow

programmeradmin2浏览0评论

I'm trying to skip one object from an array objects based on a async operator. I've tried following cases, but getting a Type error.

Tried Method 1

newObjectArray = await Promise.all(objectAray.reduce(async (result, el) => {
  const asyncResult = await someAsyncTask(el);
  if (asyncResult) {
      result.push(newSavedFile);
  }
  return result;
}, []));

Tried Method 2

newObjectArray = await Promise.all(objectAray.reduce(async (prevPromise, el) => {
  const collection = await prevPromise;
  const asyncResult = await someAsyncTask(el);
  if (asyncResult) {
      prevPromise.push(newSavedFile);
  }

  collection.push(newSavedFile);
  return collection;
}, Promise.resolve([])));

Error

'TypeError: #<Promise> is not iterable',
'    at Function.all (<anonymous>)',

I'm trying to skip one object from an array objects based on a async operator. I've tried following cases, but getting a Type error.

Tried Method 1

newObjectArray = await Promise.all(objectAray.reduce(async (result, el) => {
  const asyncResult = await someAsyncTask(el);
  if (asyncResult) {
      result.push(newSavedFile);
  }
  return result;
}, []));

Tried Method 2

newObjectArray = await Promise.all(objectAray.reduce(async (prevPromise, el) => {
  const collection = await prevPromise;
  const asyncResult = await someAsyncTask(el);
  if (asyncResult) {
      prevPromise.push(newSavedFile);
  }

  collection.push(newSavedFile);
  return collection;
}, Promise.resolve([])));

Error

'TypeError: #<Promise> is not iterable',
'    at Function.all (<anonymous>)',
Share Improve this question asked Oct 5, 2018 at 22:36 Ankit BalyanAnkit Balyan 1,32919 silver badges33 bronze badges 1
  • Could you please explain what is the desired output? – gr4viton Commented Oct 5, 2018 at 22:39
Add a ment  | 

1 Answer 1

Reset to default 15

In your first try, result is a promise as all async functions evaluate to a promise when called, so you have to await result before you can push to the array, and then you don't need the Promise.all:

 newObjectArray = await objectAray.reduce(async (result, el) => {
  const asyncResult = await someAsyncTask(el);
  if (asyncResult) {
    (await result).push(newSavedFile);
  }
  return result;
}, []);

But I'd guess that it is way faster to just filter afterwards:

 newObjectArray = (await Promise.all(objArray.map(someAsyncTask))).filter(el => el);
发布评论

评论列表(0)

  1. 暂无评论