I have an Isotope gallery (version 2) with almost 400 elements. A typical gallery item looks like this:

<div class="element hybrid a" data-category="hybrid">
    <p class="type">H</p>
    <h2 class="name">Name</h2>
    <p class="strain-info">No Info Available</p>
    <p class="review"><a class="button radius small black review-form-lb" href="#review-form-lightbox">Review</a></p>
</div>

For instance when I run the code below, which basically adds a class to the element clicked, it takes several seconds for the element to enlarge.

$container.on( 'click', '.element', function() {
  $( this ).toggleClass('large');
  $container.isotope('layout');
});

Another example is if I have a button group that contains several options to filter the gallery, again it takes several seconds. Filter JS:

$('#filters').on( 'click', '.button', function() {
  var $this = $(this);
  // get group key
  var $buttonGroup = $this.parents('.button-group');
  var filterGroup = $buttonGroup.attr('data-filter-group');
  // set filter for group
  filters[ filterGroup ] = $this.attr('data-filter');
  // combine filters
  var filterValue = '';
  for ( var prop in filters ) {
    filterValue += filters[ prop ];
  }
  // set filter for Isotope
  $container.isotope({ filter: filterValue });
});

Here is the variable for $container

// init Isotope
var $container = $('.isotope').isotope({
  itemSelector: '.element',
  layoutMode: 'fitRows',
  filter: function() {
    return qsRegex ? $(this).text().match( qsRegex ) : true;
  }
});

I should note that the above code works great when there is a small number of items. How could I improve the performance of the gallery?

I should note that in version 1 of Isotopes I have the same gallery and it works fine. I am upgrading because of enhanced abilities of v2 of isotopes.

Here is the live site - IMPORTANT! - This site is for a marijuana dispensary in Colorado, USA. Website may not be appropriate for work.

Update

I tried changing all divs to li elements. Didn't see much improvement.

I tried turning on hardware acceleration per mfirdaus's answer but it didn't appear to work.

Note: The above link to the live site is a stripped down version where I removed everything not required for the Isotope gallery. It is slightly faster than when I originally posted this, however, it needs to be more responsive. Try using it on a tablet and it takes several seconds for the Isotope item to respond.

Update 2

Version One of Isotopes performs much better with a large gallery and I ended up using version one because of this.

I have an Isotope gallery (version 2) with almost 400 elements. A typical gallery item looks like this:

<div class="element hybrid a" data-category="hybrid">
    <p class="type">H</p>
    <h2 class="name">Name</h2>
    <p class="strain-info">No Info Available</p>
    <p class="review"><a class="button radius small black review-form-lb" href="#review-form-lightbox">Review</a></p>
</div>

For instance when I run the code below, which basically adds a class to the element clicked, it takes several seconds for the element to enlarge.

$container.on( 'click', '.element', function() {
  $( this ).toggleClass('large');
  $container.isotope('layout');
});

Another example is if I have a button group that contains several options to filter the gallery, again it takes several seconds. Filter JS:

$('#filters').on( 'click', '.button', function() {
  var $this = $(this);
  // get group key
  var $buttonGroup = $this.parents('.button-group');
  var filterGroup = $buttonGroup.attr('data-filter-group');
  // set filter for group
  filters[ filterGroup ] = $this.attr('data-filter');
  // combine filters
  var filterValue = '';
  for ( var prop in filters ) {
    filterValue += filters[ prop ];
  }
  // set filter for Isotope
  $container.isotope({ filter: filterValue });
});

Here is the variable for $container

// init Isotope
var $container = $('.isotope').isotope({
  itemSelector: '.element',
  layoutMode: 'fitRows',
  filter: function() {
    return qsRegex ? $(this).text().match( qsRegex ) : true;
  }
});

I should note that the above code works great when there is a small number of items. How could I improve the performance of the gallery?

I should note that in version 1 of Isotopes I have the same gallery and it works fine. I am upgrading because of enhanced abilities of v2 of isotopes.

Here is the live site - IMPORTANT! - This site is for a marijuana dispensary in Colorado, USA. Website may not be appropriate for work.

Update

I tried changing all divs to li elements. Didn't see much improvement.

I tried turning on hardware acceleration per mfirdaus's answer but it didn't appear to work.

Note: The above link to the live site is a stripped down version where I removed everything not required for the Isotope gallery. It is slightly faster than when I originally posted this, however, it needs to be more responsive. Try using it on a tablet and it takes several seconds for the Isotope item to respond.

Update 2

Version One of Isotopes performs much better with a large gallery and I ended up using version one because of this.

• javascript
• jquery
• jquery-isotope

• @JakeGould - I wouldn't think using a div over an li element would matter much but I have been surprised before. => I will give it a try. – L84 Commented May 25, 2014 at 4:07
• @JakeGould - Changing to li elements didn't work but it saved a few bytes of data at the least. => – L84 Commented May 25, 2014 at 23:42
• Have you tried to force 'animationEngine' option only to css? Here a discussion about max items github.com/metafizzy/isotope/issues/191 so De Sandro suggest 100 items. another way is to extend isotope with pagination or hide/show item based on user scrolling – keypaul Commented May 29, 2014 at 16:22
• @keypaul - I will look at that. Thank You. Also the idea for showing items based on scrolling is something I considered but I have filtering and I am unsure how to combine the scrolling + filters. Any thoughts on that? – L84 Commented May 29, 2014 at 17:36
• Here a good article css-tricks.com/slide-in-as-you-scroll-down-boxes , you need to use as selector, one that match your filters. Also to improve performance on scroll events you can use RAF for debouncing here a good article html5rocks.com/it/tutorials/speed/scrolling I've done, in a little site, isotope + pagination (without extend isotope) but only cause the client wanted ( is not a real interaction/usability improvement ... also boring ) – keypaul Commented May 29, 2014 at 21:05

4 Answers 4

I have a suggestion. First of all, you can add the css property transform:translate3d(0,0,0) to your .element css selector. This turns on hardware acceleration and should speed up the page reflow. This is a tip often used to make highly animated pages smoother, especially on mobile. so something ilke:

.element {
  ...
  /* add this. prefixes for compabtibility */
  transform:translate3d(0,0,0);
  -webkit-transform:translate3d(0,0,0);
  -moz-transform:translate3d(0,0,0);
}

In my tests it seems to speed it up quite nicely.

Another suggestion would be to replace .on("click") with .on("mousedown"). click fires after the mouse is released whereas mousedown would fire immediately after the user press their mouse. there is like a ~0.2s difference but it's somewhat noticable.

Here's an example made from isotope's default example which has 400 elements.

After testing out touchstart, it kinda helps but it fires even when scrolling. So this helps only if you disable scroll/have fixed viewport. Maybe you could add iScroll, but I reckon that's even more bloat.

One option you could try is to force an element to resize first, before waiting for isotope to recalculate the positions. We can do this by using setTimeout on the isotope refresh. Not sure if the behaviour is acceptable but this will allow the user to get feedback faster. So your toggling code will be something like:

$container.on( 'click', '.element',function() {
  $( this ).toggleClass('large');
  setTimeout(function(){ $container.isotope('layout'); },20); //queue this later
});

Demo. Tested this on my android device and there seemed to be an improvement.

Well, the author of the isotope plugin recommends 50 items max if you're doing filtering or sorting. You have 400!.. So I'm afraid you'll need to decrease the num. of items for better performance.

Some side notes:

• Try touchstart or mousedown events instead of click for a bit more quick responses on mobile.
• Check for Object.keys(filters).forEach performance on mobile (instead of for in)..
• jQuery's closest() method might be faster than parents() in some browsers.

Instead of using toggleClass, try directly manipulating the style.

$( this ).css({ /* styles for large */});

While I understand that this may not be an issue directly related to your scenario, I had the same experience (mostly on mobile and tablet devices) where I had only 36 images in an Isotope gallery, and I was waiting anywhere from 3-5 seconds for the reflow to occur.

In my case it was due to the fact that I had multiple (3) event listeners on the 'resize' event. Bad move! The resize event is fired several hundred times as it keeps firing until the user stops resizing the screen.

It also turns out that scrolling on iOS devices fires the resize event as well, so I had a resource intensive function (cloning a complex mega menu and rebuilding it for mobile devices) queuing hundreds of times, thus causing all js related tasks to lockup or become intensely slow.

The solution in my case was to implement a debounce function to debounce the functions attached to the 'resize' event, thus firing them once and only when the resize is complete.

For what it's worth, I adapted the Underscore.js debounce function so that I could use it locally and outside of Underscore.js, which was borrowed from this blog post by David Walsh. Here is an example of how I implemented it:

  var debounce = function(func, wait, immediate) {
    var timeout;
    return function() {
        var context = this, args = arguments;
        var later = function() {
            timeout = null;
            if (!immediate) func.apply(context, args);
        };
        var callNow = immediate && !timeout;
        clearTimeout(timeout);
        timeout = setTimeout(later, wait);
        if (callNow) func.apply(context, args);
    };
};

var checkWindowWidthForNav = debounce(function(e) {
    sdWidth = Math.max(document.documentElement.clientWidth, window.innerWidth || 0);
    if(sdWidth <= 990){
        window.simulateMobileNav = true;
        sdMobileSnapMenus();
    }else{
        window.mobileScaffoldingDone = false;
        window.simulateMobileNav = false;
        sdMobileSnapMenus();
        $("[data-action=\"hover-toggle\"]").bind("mouseenter", function(e){
            var $target = $(e.currentTarget).attr("data-target");
            var $hide = $(e.currentTarget).attr("data-hide");
            $($hide).hide();
            $($target).show();
        });
        $(".subMenuWrapper:visible").hide();
        $(".subMenuWrapper").bind("mouseleave", function(e){
            $(".subMenuWrapper").fadeOut(500, function(){
                $(".sdSubMenu .sdHideFilters, #sdArchitecturalFilters, #sdInteriorFilters, #sdUrbanFilters").hide();
            });
            return false;
            e.preventDefault();
            e.returnValue = false;
        });
        $(".sdMainMenu > ul li a[data-action], .sdSubMenu a[data-action]").bind("click", function(e){
            e.preventDefault();
            e.returnValue = false;
            return false;
        });
        $(".sdMainMenu > ul .sdSubMenu").hide();
    }

}, 600); // Debounced function occurs 600ms after event ends

window.addEventListener("resize", checkWindowWidthForNav, false);

Debouncing my events resulted in a DRAMATIC increase in speed for all JS related events. I no longer had the Isotope lag, my reflow was instant.

This may help someone who was in the same boat I was in.