I am new to JS and Node. From what I been reading it seems like ES6 import is not supported in Node so I am forced to use experiment mode (renaming my file to mjs)
This works for the most part unless the mjs file needs to use require
. My current solution is to break out the chunk of code that depends on require to a seperate .js file and import that js file
foo.mjs
import readFileSync from './util.js'
...
//orignally just do require('fs') and do fs.readFileSync()
const configFile = readFileSync(configFilePath);
util.js
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
function readFileSync(filePath) {
console.log(__dirname)
console.log(path.resolve(__dirname, filePath))
return fs.readFileSync(path.resolve(__dirname, filePath), 'utf8');
}
module.exports = readFileSync
Is there a way I can avoid doing this? My app.js has lots of require
and I don't want to break out all those parts into separate js files.
I tried changing require to import
// const express = require('express');
import * as express from 'express';
but when run node --experimental-modules app.mjs
I get an error
TypeError: express is not a function
I think I need to either
- find a way to use
require
in mjs - or find a way to import stuff in mjs into a js file
I am new to JS and Node. From what I been reading it seems like ES6 import is not supported in Node so I am forced to use experiment mode (renaming my file to mjs)
This works for the most part unless the mjs file needs to use require
. My current solution is to break out the chunk of code that depends on require to a seperate .js file and import that js file
foo.mjs
import readFileSync from './util.js'
...
//orignally just do require('fs') and do fs.readFileSync()
const configFile = readFileSync(configFilePath);
util.js
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
function readFileSync(filePath) {
console.log(__dirname)
console.log(path.resolve(__dirname, filePath))
return fs.readFileSync(path.resolve(__dirname, filePath), 'utf8');
}
module.exports = readFileSync
Is there a way I can avoid doing this? My app.js has lots of require
and I don't want to break out all those parts into separate js files.
I tried changing require to import
// const express = require('express');
import * as express from 'express';
but when run node --experimental-modules app.mjs
I get an error
TypeError: express is not a function
I think I need to either
- find a way to use
require
in mjs - or find a way to import stuff in mjs into a js file
1 Answer
Reset to default 17You have three decent options:
- Use Babel or TypeScript to get interoperability between the two types of modules
- Write a little wrapper to redefine
require
in ESM code - Use
import()
(dynamic import) in your CJS to import ESM code
The wrapper to use require
in ESM code:
import { createRequire } from 'module'
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url)
const cjsFile = require('./test') // test is regular .js file using module.exports
Dynamic imports:
// foo.mjs:
export const foo = () => true
// index.js:
import('./foo.mjs').then(x => console.log(x.foo()))
Large projects with mixed module types frequently use Babel and/or TypeScript, both of which handle the mixed types just fine. Babel would be simpler to learn and get set up. But if you don't have a ton of code to deal with, the createRequire
method works just fine.
As for the issue with Express, it failed because the default export is what you want: import express from 'express'
, not import * as express...
.