I have two functions, they do look alike but what I don't really understand is when inside the for
-loop, since the input is an array, why doesn't the array need any index to call the first array?
I have an array of...
var puzzlers = [
function(a) { return 8 * a - 10; },
function(a) { return (a - 3) * (a - 3) * (a - 3); },
function(a) { return a * a + 4; },
function(a) { return a % 5; }
];
I'm trying to loop through the array with an input. The result of the first function will then be used as the next function's input then the first array will be removed.
This is what I wrote...
function applyAndEmpty(input, queue)
{
var length = queue.length;
for(var i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
input = queue[0](input);
queue.shift();
}
return input;
}
The above does give me the answer but then I see that there's another way of writing it which is
var applyAndEmpty = function(input, queue)
{
var length = queue.length;
for(var i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
input = queue.shift()(input);
}
return input;
};
What I don't understand is the part input = queue.shift()(input)
.
Doesn't the queue
need an index?
I have two functions, they do look alike but what I don't really understand is when inside the for
-loop, since the input is an array, why doesn't the array need any index to call the first array?
I have an array of...
var puzzlers = [
function(a) { return 8 * a - 10; },
function(a) { return (a - 3) * (a - 3) * (a - 3); },
function(a) { return a * a + 4; },
function(a) { return a % 5; }
];
I'm trying to loop through the array with an input. The result of the first function will then be used as the next function's input then the first array will be removed.
This is what I wrote...
function applyAndEmpty(input, queue)
{
var length = queue.length;
for(var i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
input = queue[0](input);
queue.shift();
}
return input;
}
The above does give me the answer but then I see that there's another way of writing it which is
var applyAndEmpty = function(input, queue)
{
var length = queue.length;
for(var i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
input = queue.shift()(input);
}
return input;
};
What I don't understand is the part input = queue.shift()(input)
.
Doesn't the queue
need an index?
2 Answers
Reset to default 15So you're basically asking what shift
does and here you go:
What you can do using for(var i=0;
... you can do using shift()
(quite similar but not!)
Using for
loop (and index
)
var array = [
function(){return "a";},
function(){return "b";}
];
for(var i=0; i<array.length; i++){
console.log( array[i]() );
// "a"
// "b"
}
console.log(array.length); //2 !!Still there!!!
Using shift()
(and while
for example)
var array = [
function(){return "a";},
function(){return "b";}
];
while(array.length){ // while array has length
console.log( array.shift()() ); // execute and remove from array
// "a"
// "b"
}
console.log(array.length); //0 !!!Empty array due to shift()!!!
So basically it removes a key from your Array and returns it.
As long as that array has keys it will loop until it's empty.
The difference between the two is drastic:
The for
loop in example 1. will loop but not alter your original array.
Using shift()
in example 2. you're (using and) removing your Array keys one by one.
Read more about Array manipulation:
Array.prototype.shift 1 <-- [2,3,4]
Array.prototype.unshift 5 --> [5,2,3,4]
Array.prototype.push [5,2,3,4,6] <-- 6
Array.prototype.pop [5,2,3,4] --> 6
and other Methods
You can simplify the logic using Array.reduce
Here how you can do that:
var puzzlers = [
function(a) { return 8 * a - 10; },
function(a) { return (a - 3) * (a - 3) * (a - 3); },
function(a) { return a * a + 4; },
function(a) { return a % 5; }
];
function runPuzzler(inputValue){
return puzzlers.reduce(function(prev, curr){
return curr(prev);
},inputValue);
}
Output :
EachArrayValues::100
EachArrayValues::200
EachArrayValues::0
EachArrayValues::400
EachArrayValues::500
EachArrayValues::-50
Negative value found, ie -50
shift()
does - And that's executing a function from your array and removing it from the Array stack. – Roko C. Buljan Commented Oct 12, 2016 at 22:48shift()
removes the first element in the array and returns it. It's inefficient though for what you're doing. – castletheperson Commented Oct 12, 2016 at 22:51