What is the proper way to remove mesh form scene? In this example:
removable_items = [];
box = new THREE.Object3D();
scene.add(box);
function add() {
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh( new THREE.IcosahedronGeometry( 10, 5 ), new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( {color: 0xFFFFFF}) );
box.add( mesh );
removable_items.push(mesh);
//clean(); ///// when is integrated in function memory is cleaned properly
}
function clean() {
if( removable_items.length > 0 ) {
removable_items.forEach(function(v,i) {
v.parent.remove(v);
});
removable_items = null;
removable_items = [];
}
}
function makeExperiment(r) {
var i = 0;
while (i < r) {
add();
i++;
if( r === i ) console.log(r+' finnished ');
}
}
makeExperiment(50);
/// after that i mannualy set clean();
meshes are not visible at scene anymore, as expected, but sill using memory, which after some time finish with memory leak and browser crash.
Where is the problem, did THREE.js making some other references?
THREE.js R73
EDIT: when is clean();
integrated in function (commented now in code) memory is cleaned properly. But when I set clean();
manually after makeExperiment();
is done, memory is not set as free.
What is the proper way to remove mesh form scene? In this example:
removable_items = [];
box = new THREE.Object3D();
scene.add(box);
function add() {
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh( new THREE.IcosahedronGeometry( 10, 5 ), new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial( {color: 0xFFFFFF}) );
box.add( mesh );
removable_items.push(mesh);
//clean(); ///// when is integrated in function memory is cleaned properly
}
function clean() {
if( removable_items.length > 0 ) {
removable_items.forEach(function(v,i) {
v.parent.remove(v);
});
removable_items = null;
removable_items = [];
}
}
function makeExperiment(r) {
var i = 0;
while (i < r) {
add();
i++;
if( r === i ) console.log(r+' finnished ');
}
}
makeExperiment(50);
/// after that i mannualy set clean();
meshes are not visible at scene anymore, as expected, but sill using memory, which after some time finish with memory leak and browser crash.
Where is the problem, did THREE.js making some other references?
THREE.js R73
EDIT: when is clean();
integrated in function (commented now in code) memory is cleaned properly. But when I set clean();
manually after makeExperiment();
is done, memory is not set as free.
1 Answer
Reset to default 21 +200I've done a few experiments and i think there is nothing really wrong with your code. One thing that i've learned though, is that that garbage collector might not run exactly when you think it does. Just in case, I wrapped your code in a IIFE (good practice but not necessary in this case) and expected the heap to be cleared as soon as the function finished running and went out of scope. But it actually took some time for it to clear:
So i thought, okey, thats not to good, what if i was creating more objects in that timespan where the garbage collector is just lingering, so i did:
.
.
makeExperiment(50);
clean();
makeExperiment(50);
clean();
makeExperiment(50);
clean();
makeExperiment(50);
clean();
makeExperiment(50);
clean();
makeExperiment(50);
clean();
makeExperiment(50);
clean();
makeExperiment(50);
clean();
and this is what happened:
The garbage collector seems to be doing its job, and you are deleting them correctly for this purpose. However, You are probably using THREE.js Renderer aswell, and if I understand it correctly, the Renderer keeps references to materials, geometries and textures. So if these are not disposed of correctly, they will not be garbage collected. THREE.js has a method for Geometry
s, Material
s and Texture
s called .dispose()
which will notify the Renderer to remove it aswell. So this is how I would change your clean()
function:
removable_items.forEach(function(v,i) {
v.material.dispose();
v.geometry.dispose();
box.remove(v);
});
new THREE.IcosahedronGeometry( 1, 5 )
The 2nd parameter is detail. Having it as 5 makes for a lot of processing. Is that part of your problem that you want answered? The default is 1. – dcromley Commented Jun 13, 2016 at 1:39v.parent.remove(v);
will work as expected? – 2pha Commented Jun 17, 2016 at 10:04