I need to compare two numeric values for equality in Javascript. The values may be NaN
as well.
I've come up with this code:
if (val1 == val2 || isNaN(val1) && isNaN(val2)) ...
which is working fine, but it looks bloated to me. I would like to make it more concise. Any ideas?
I need to compare two numeric values for equality in Javascript. The values may be NaN
as well.
I've come up with this code:
if (val1 == val2 || isNaN(val1) && isNaN(val2)) ...
which is working fine, but it looks bloated to me. I would like to make it more concise. Any ideas?
Share Improve this question asked Jan 22, 2012 at 22:40 GOTO 0GOTO 0 47.5k25 gold badges138 silver badges164 bronze badges 3 |12 Answers
Reset to default 57if(val1 == val2 || (isNaN(val1) && isNaN(val2)))
Nothing to improve. Just add the parentheses to make it clear to everyone.
Avoid isNaN
. Its behaviour is misleading:
isNaN(undefined) // true
_.isNaN
(from Underscore.js) is an elegant function which behaves as expected:
// Is the given value `NaN`?
//
// `NaN` is the only value for which `===` is not reflexive.
_.isNaN = function(obj) {
return obj !== obj;
};
_.isNaN(undefined) // false
_.isNaN(0/0) // true
Try using Object.is()
, it determines whether two values are the same value. Two values are the same if one of the following holds:
- both
undefined
- both
null
- both
true
or bothfalse
- both strings of the same length with the same characters in the same order
- both the same object
- both numbers and
- both
+0
- both
-0
- both
NaN
- or both non-zero and both not
NaN
and both have the same value
- both
e.g. Object.is(NaN, NaN)
=> true
Refer to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/is
if ( val1 === val2 )
If either one or both are NaN
it will evaluate to false.
Also, NaN !== NaN
As long as you know these two variables are numeric, you can try:
if (val1 + '' == val2 + '')
It turns the two values into strings. A funny answer, but it should work. :)
NaN is never equal to itself no matter the comparison method, so the only more concise solution for your problem that I can think of would be to create a function call with a descriptive name for doing this rather special comparison and use that comparison function in your code instead.
That would also have the advantage of localizing changes to the algorithm the day you decide that undefined should be equal to undefined too.
And what's about the function Number.isNaN() ? I believe this must be used whenever is possible.
> NaN === NaN
false
> Number.isNaN
ƒ isNaN() { [native code] }
> Number.isNaN() === Number.isNaN()
true
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/isNaN
For Numeric cases the solution is fine but to extend it to work for other data-types as well my suggestion would be as follows:
if(val1 === val2 || (val1 !== val1 && val2 !== val2))
Reason being global isNaN
is erroneous. It will give you wrong results in scenarios like
isNaN(undefined); // true
isNaN({}); // true
isNaN("lorem ipsum"); // true
I have posted a comprehensive answer here which covers the NaN comparison for equality as well.
How to test if a JavaScript variable is
NaN
An arrow function can 'unbloat' your conditional and I would use Number.isNaN()
instead of isNaN()
due to the fact that isNaN()
will try to convert the value to a number.
const areEqual = (a, b) => a === b || (Number.isNaN(a) && Number.isNaN(b));
if (areEqual(val1, val2)) {...}
Using isNaN()
might lead to the following problems:
let val1 = 'a string';
let val2 = undefined;
let val3 = {};
isNaN(val1) && isNaN(val2) && isNaN(val3); // true
Number.isNaN(val1) && Number.isNaN(val2) && Number.isNaN(val3); // false
isNaN(1n); // Uncaught TypeError: Cannot convert a BigInt value to a number
Number.isNaN(1n); // false
Number.isNaN() - JavaScript | MDN
Why not an if statement like this?
if (isNaN(x) == true){
alert("This is not a number.");
}
Equality comparison with NaN always results in False
.
We can go for the javascript function isNaN()
for checking equality with NaN.
Example:
1. isNaN(123) //false
2. var array = [3, NaN];
for(var i = 0 ; i< array.length; i++){
if(isNaN(array[i])){
console.log("True ---- Values of " + i);
} else {
console.log("false ---- Values of " + i);
}
}
Results:
false ---- Values of 0
True ---- Values of 1
Found another way using Array.prototype.includes MDN link. Apparently, [NaN].includes(NaN) returns true for NaN.
function IsActuallyNaN(obj) {
return [obj].includes(NaN);
}
Or we can go with davidchambers' solution which is much simpler.
function IsActuallyNaN2(obj) {
return obj !== obj;
}
||
and&&
without some parentheses is extremely ugly and confusing. – ThiefMaster Commented Jan 22, 2012 at 22:42NaN
andNaN
are supposed to be unequal for a reason, because, for example,0/0
andparseInt("not a number!")
, while they both evaluate toNaN
, should not be considered equal. – Peter Olson Commented Jan 22, 2012 at 22:44