static
static_cast 和C风格的转换有什么区别？(What is the difference between static_cast and C style casting?)有没有理由喜欢static_cast<>超过C风格的投射？ 他们是等同的吗？ 他们有什么差别吗？
Is there any reason to prefer static_cast<> over C style casting? Are they equivalent? Is their any sort of speed difference?
最满意答案编译器检查C ++样式转换。 C样式转换在运行时不会失败
也可以轻松地搜索c ++风格的转换，而很难搜索c风格的转换
另外一个很大的好处是，4种不同的C ++风格的演员更清楚地表达了程序员的意图。
在编写C ++时，我总是使用C语言C语言。
C++ style casts are checked by the compiler. C style casts aren't and can fail at runtime
also, c++ style casts can be searched for easily, whereas it's really hard to search for c style casts
Another big benefit is that the 4 different C++ style casts express the intent of the programmer more clearly.
When writing C++ I'd pretty much always use the C++ ones over the the C style.