I have this Customer class:
export class Customer {
id: number;
pany: string;
firstName: string;
lastName: string;
name(): string {
if (thispany)
return thispany;
if (this.lastName && this.firstName)
return this.lastName + ", " + this.firstName;
if (this.lastName)
return this.lastName;
if (this.firstName)
return this.firstName;
if (this.id > 0)
return "#" + this.id;
return "New Customer";
}
}
In my controller I pull down a list of customers:
export class CustomersController {
static $inject = ["customerService", "workflowService"];
ready: boolean;
customers: Array<Customer>;
constructor(customerService: CustomerService, workflowService: WorkflowService) {
customerService.getAll().then(
(response) => {
this.customers = response.data;
this.ready = true;
},
() => {
this.ready = true;
}
);
workflowService.uiCustomer.reset();
}
}
angular.module("app")
.controller("CustomersController", ["customerService", "workflowService", CustomersController]);
If it helps, getAll() looks like this:
getAll(): ng.IHttpPromise<Array<Customer>> {
return this.http.get("/api/customers");
}
It's this statement that's causing me grief: this.customers = response.data;
But response.data is strongly typed, so shouldn't it "know" about Customer and name()?
When I do that, of course I am overwriting my strongly typed array with the dumb JSON one, which doesn't have my name() method on it.
So how do I keep my name method without copying every property of every object in the list?
Is this bad design on my part? Having these read-only properties was really mon in C#, but I'm a little new to the javascript world. Should I be using a utility class instead?
My current work-around:
this.customers = response.data.map(customer => {
return angular.copy(customer, new Customer());
});
Feels wrong to build a whole new array and copy all those fields (in my real project Customer has many more properties).
Edit: I've found a few related SO questions, such as Mapping JSON Objects to Javascript Objects as mentioned by @xmojmr. My question was specific to TypeScript and I was wondering if TypeScript had any facilities of its own that would generate the javascript to make this a non-issue. If that's not the case, and we're sure TypeScript doesn't aim to solve this class of problem, then we can regard this question as a duplicate.
I have this Customer class:
export class Customer {
id: number;
pany: string;
firstName: string;
lastName: string;
name(): string {
if (this.pany)
return this.pany;
if (this.lastName && this.firstName)
return this.lastName + ", " + this.firstName;
if (this.lastName)
return this.lastName;
if (this.firstName)
return this.firstName;
if (this.id > 0)
return "#" + this.id;
return "New Customer";
}
}
In my controller I pull down a list of customers:
export class CustomersController {
static $inject = ["customerService", "workflowService"];
ready: boolean;
customers: Array<Customer>;
constructor(customerService: CustomerService, workflowService: WorkflowService) {
customerService.getAll().then(
(response) => {
this.customers = response.data;
this.ready = true;
},
() => {
this.ready = true;
}
);
workflowService.uiCustomer.reset();
}
}
angular.module("app")
.controller("CustomersController", ["customerService", "workflowService", CustomersController]);
If it helps, getAll() looks like this:
getAll(): ng.IHttpPromise<Array<Customer>> {
return this.http.get("/api/customers");
}
It's this statement that's causing me grief: this.customers = response.data;
But response.data is strongly typed, so shouldn't it "know" about Customer and name()?
When I do that, of course I am overwriting my strongly typed array with the dumb JSON one, which doesn't have my name() method on it.
So how do I keep my name method without copying every property of every object in the list?
Is this bad design on my part? Having these read-only properties was really mon in C#, but I'm a little new to the javascript world. Should I be using a utility class instead?
My current work-around:
this.customers = response.data.map(customer => {
return angular.copy(customer, new Customer());
});
Feels wrong to build a whole new array and copy all those fields (in my real project Customer has many more properties).
Edit: I've found a few related SO questions, such as Mapping JSON Objects to Javascript Objects as mentioned by @xmojmr. My question was specific to TypeScript and I was wondering if TypeScript had any facilities of its own that would generate the javascript to make this a non-issue. If that's not the case, and we're sure TypeScript doesn't aim to solve this class of problem, then we can regard this question as a duplicate.
Share Improve this question edited May 23, 2017 at 11:45 CommunityBot 11 silver badge asked Nov 6, 2015 at 23:57 ChristopherChristopher 10.7k14 gold badges78 silver badges99 bronze badges 1- Possible duplicate of Mapping JSON Objects to Javascript Objects – xmojmr Commented Nov 7, 2015 at 8:06
1 Answer
Reset to default 7You're exactly right about what is happening. Typing in typescript mainly provides you with piler checking. Under the covers, everything piles to JavaScript which isn't strongly typed.
So, when you say:
getAll(): ng.IHttpPromise<Array<Customer>> {
return this.http.get("/api/customers");
}
all you are really doing is telling is telling the piler "Hey, I'm pretty sure my api endpoint is going to return an array of Customer
objects." But as you know, it really just returns a "dumb JSON" array.
What you could consider doing, is creating an interface that describes the JSON object being returned by the API endpoint. Something like:
interface ICustomer {
id: number;
pany: string;
firstName: string;
lastName: string;
}
And then getAll()
bees:
getAll(): ng.IHttpPromise<Array<ICustomer>> {
return this.http.get("/api/customers");
}
Then you could have a class who's constructor takes ICustomer
as a parameter. Or you could create a class with a static method that takes ICustomer
and returns the "name".
Obviously, what you are doing now works, but I think you're right to be looking for something that better municates the intent.