最新消息:雨落星辰是一个专注网站SEO优化、网站SEO诊断、搜索引擎研究、网络营销推广、网站策划运营及站长类的自媒体原创博客

jquery - Top values in the object, displayed with keys, javascript - Stack Overflow

programmeradmin13浏览0评论

I'm able to successfuly find out the largest values in the object, however. There is a problem, and that is inability to display the associated key with that value.

var obj = {
    t1: 1,
    t2: 33,
    t3: 10,
    t4: 9,
    t5: 45,
    t6: 101
    //...
}

// create an array
var arr = [];

// loop through the object and add values to the array
for (var p in obj) {
  arr.push(obj[p]);
}

// sort the array, largest numbers to lowest
arr.sort(function(a,b){return b - a});

// grab the first 10 numbers
var firstThree = arr.slice(0, 3);
console.log(firstThree);

I'm able to successfuly find out the largest values in the object, however. There is a problem, and that is inability to display the associated key with that value.

var obj = {
    t1: 1,
    t2: 33,
    t3: 10,
    t4: 9,
    t5: 45,
    t6: 101
    //...
}

// create an array
var arr = [];

// loop through the object and add values to the array
for (var p in obj) {
  arr.push(obj[p]);
}

// sort the array, largest numbers to lowest
arr.sort(function(a,b){return b - a});

// grab the first 10 numbers
var firstThree = arr.slice(0, 3);
console.log(firstThree);

It can display the top values, however i'm having a hard time to display keys with that.

The result should be like

var result = {
    t6: 101,
    t5: 45,
    t2: 33

}
Share Improve this question edited Jan 30, 2019 at 8:55 Alexandre Elshobokshy 10.9k6 gold badges34 silver badges60 bronze badges asked Jan 28, 2019 at 11:57 StasStas 6956 silver badges22 bronze badges 4
  • Do you need result to be the same object as obj (with the other keys removed), or an entirely new object (so, you now have two)? – VLAZ Commented Jan 28, 2019 at 12:00
  • Whatever is the most efficient way, is the way im after, I just want to send and object with highest values and associated keys with that – Stas Commented Jan 28, 2019 at 12:03
  • Possible duplicate of Sorting JavaScript Object by property value – Ayman Safadi Commented Jan 28, 2019 at 12:07
  • not really a dublicate, i think here is more straightforward and more flexible – Stas Commented Jan 28, 2019 at 12:11
Add a ment  | 

8 Answers 8

Reset to default 8

You could get the entries, sort and slice them and build a new object by assigning mapped objects to a single object.

var object = { t1: 1, t2: 33, t3: 10, t4: 9, t5: 45, t6: 101 },
    result = Object.assign(                      // collect all objects into a single obj
        ...Object                                // spread the final array as parameters
            .entries(object)                     // key a list of key/ value pairs
            .sort(({ 1: a }, { 1: b }) => b - a) // sort DESC by index 1
            .slice(0, 3)                         // get first three items of array
            .map(([k, v]) => ({ [k]: v }))       // map an object with a destructured
    );                                           // key/value pair

console.log(result);

You can push objects into array instead of values, so that you can store keys

var obj = {
    t1: 1,
    t2: 33,
    t3: 10,
    t4: 9,
    t5: 45,
    t6: 101
}

// create an array
var arr = [];

// loop through the object and add values to the array
for (var p in obj) {
  arr.push({key: p, value: obj[p]});
}

// sort the array, largest numbers to lowest
arr.sort(function(a,b){return b.value - a.value});

// grab the first 10 numbers
var firstThree = arr.slice(0, 3);
console.log(firstThree);

You could push to your array an object containing the key and value association arr.push({p: obj[p]})

var obj = {
  t1: 1,
  t2: 33,
  t3: 10,
  t4: 9,
  t5: 45,
  t6: 101
}

// create an array
var arr = [];

// loop through the object and add values to the array
for (var p in obj) {
  arr.push({
    p: obj[p]
  });
}

// sort the array, largest numbers to lowest
arr.sort(function(a, b) {
  return b - a
});

// grab the first 10 numbers
var firstThree = arr.slice(0, 3);
console.log(firstThree);

Nothing fancy but does the job :-)

you can do something like this

var obj = {
  t1: 1,
  t2: 33,
  t3: 10,
  t4: 9,
  t5: 45,
  t6: 101
};

// create an array
var arr = [];

// loop through the object and add values to the array
for (var p in obj) {
  arr.push({ key: p, val: obj[p] });
}

// sort the array, largest numbers to lowest
arr.sort(function(a, b) {
  return b.val - a.val;
});

// grab the first 10 numbers
var firstThree = arr.slice(0, 3);
console.log(...firstThree);

You can first get the values of that object and sort it. Then loop over to the key-value of that object using Object.entries() and determine the key of that value which belong to top 3 values:

var obj = {
    t1: 1,
    t2: 33,
    t3: 10,
    t4: 9,
    t5: 45,
    t6: 101
};

var values = Object.values(obj).sort((a,b) => b-a).slice(0,3);
let resultObj = {};
Object.entries(obj).forEach((item) => {
  if(values.indexOf(item[1]) !== -1){
    resultObj[item[0]] = item[1];
  }
});
console.log(resultObj);

Also note that the key ordering in object does not really matter when you work with object, so

{
    t6: 101,
    t5: 45,
    t2: 33

}

is similar to

{
    t2: 33,
    t5: 45,
    t6: 101

}

Alternative solution using lodash

_.chain(object)
    .map((value, key) => ({value, key}))
    .sortBy("value")
    .reverse()
    .take(3)
    .reduce((acc, item) => ({ ...acc, [item.key]: item.value}), {})
    .value();
var obj = {
  t1: 1,
  t2: 33,
  t3: 10,
  t4: 9,
  t5: 45,
  t6: 101
};

const sortedKey = Object.keys(obj).sort((a,b)=>{
if(obj[a] > obj[b]) return -1;
if(obj[a] < obj[b]) return 1;
return 0;
})
//print top three key -- val
for(let i=0; i< 3; i++) console.log(sortedKey[i], '--', obj[sortedKey[i]])

Objects key are not guaranteed to remain in order, so don't trust that.

It's safe though to create and use an array for that:

const top10KeyValArr = Object.entries(obj).sort(([_k1, val1], [_k2, val2])=> val2 - val1).slice(0, 3);

Then you can do what you want with it and it will remain in that order.

与本文相关的文章

发布评论

评论列表(0)

  1. 暂无评论