te')); return $arr; } /* 遍历用户所有主题 * @param $uid 用户ID * @param int $page 页数 * @param int $pagesize 每页记录条数 * @param bool $desc 排序方式 TRUE降序 FALSE升序 * @param string $key 返回的数组用那一列的值作为 key * @param array $col 查询哪些列 */ function thread_tid_find_by_uid($uid, $page = 1, $pagesize = 1000, $desc = TRUE, $key = 'tid', $col = array()) { if (empty($uid)) return array(); $orderby = TRUE == $desc ? -1 : 1; $arr = thread_tid__find($cond = array('uid' => $uid), array('tid' => $orderby), $page, $pagesize, $key, $col); return $arr; } // 遍历栏目下tid 支持数组 $fid = array(1,2,3) function thread_tid_find_by_fid($fid, $page = 1, $pagesize = 1000, $desc = TRUE) { if (empty($fid)) return array(); $orderby = TRUE == $desc ? -1 : 1; $arr = thread_tid__find($cond = array('fid' => $fid), array('tid' => $orderby), $page, $pagesize, 'tid', array('tid', 'verify_date')); return $arr; } function thread_tid_delete($tid) { if (empty($tid)) return FALSE; $r = thread_tid__delete(array('tid' => $tid)); return $r; } function thread_tid_count() { $n = thread_tid__count(); return $n; } // 统计用户主题数 大数量下严谨使用非主键统计 function thread_uid_count($uid) { $n = thread_tid__count(array('uid' => $uid)); return $n; } // 统计栏目主题数 大数量下严谨使用非主键统计 function thread_fid_count($fid) { $n = thread_tid__count(array('fid' => $fid)); return $n; } ?>javascript - Is it possible in Svelte to have #each loops with two-way binding to nested object values? - Stack Overflow
最新消息:雨落星辰是一个专注网站SEO优化、网站SEO诊断、搜索引擎研究、网络营销推广、网站策划运营及站长类的自媒体原创博客

javascript - Is it possible in Svelte to have #each loops with two-way binding to nested object values? - Stack Overflow

programmeradmin5浏览0评论

The following Svelte code works fine:

<input bind:value='options.name.value' placeholder='{{options.name.placeholder}}'>
<p>Hello {{options.name.value || 'stranger'}}!</p>

Using this JSON:

{
    "options": {
        "name": {
            "value": "",
            "placeholder": "enter your name"
        }
    }
}

You can see it in action. But what if we want to loop over options with an #each array...is that possible?

It almost works if we do everything except the bind:

{{#each Object.keys(options) as option}}
<input bind:value='options.name.value' placeholder='{{options[option].placeholder}}'>
<p>Hello {{options[option].value || 'stranger'}}!</p>
{{/each}}

You can see that the placeholder is correct, and the two-way binding works correctly. But the code is not correct yet, because options.name is hard-coded in for the bind, instead of using the loop value. If we try to fix that, putting bind:value='options[option].value', we get a syntax error, Expected '.

So, if it's possible to two-way bind within a loop using the loop value, what's the correct syntax?

The following Svelte code works fine:

<input bind:value='options.name.value' placeholder='{{options.name.placeholder}}'>
<p>Hello {{options.name.value || 'stranger'}}!</p>

Using this JSON:

{
    "options": {
        "name": {
            "value": "",
            "placeholder": "enter your name"
        }
    }
}

You can see it in action. But what if we want to loop over options with an #each array...is that possible?

It almost works if we do everything except the bind:

{{#each Object.keys(options) as option}}
<input bind:value='options.name.value' placeholder='{{options[option].placeholder}}'>
<p>Hello {{options[option].value || 'stranger'}}!</p>
{{/each}}

You can see that the placeholder is correct, and the two-way binding works correctly. But the code is not correct yet, because options.name is hard-coded in for the bind, instead of using the loop value. If we try to fix that, putting bind:value='options[option].value', we get a syntax error, Expected '.

So, if it's possible to two-way bind within a loop using the loop value, what's the correct syntax?

Share Improve this question asked Mar 11, 2017 at 16:31 KevKev 16.3k17 gold badges82 silver badges114 bronze badges
Add a ment  | 

2 Answers 2

Reset to default 17

The short answer is that yes, it's absolutely possible to use two-way binding inside an each block, but the value of the block has to be a straightforward array, rather than the oute of an expression like Object.keys(options):

{#each options as option}
  <input bind:value={option.value} placeholder={option.placeholder}>
{/each}
{
  "options": [
    {
      "id": "name",
      "value": "",
      "placeholder": "enter your name"
    },
    {
      "id": "email",
      "value": "",
      "placeholder": "enter your email"
    }
  ]
}

The longer answer, in which I think aloud for a few moments: using an expression (that isn't just a reference like foo or non-puted member expression like foo.bar) for two-way binding is an interesting challenge. There are actually two separate issues: firstly, distinguishing between valid expressions like options[option].value and expressions that wouldn't make any sense in a two-way binding context. Secondly, the each block expression creates a sort of barrier — if someone were to do this...

{#each Object.keys(options) as option}
  <input bind:value={option}>
{/each}

...they'd be binding to a value that is essentially read-only. But you can't tell that just from looking at the syntax. So the static analysis would need to be smart enough to understand that binding to options[option].name is valid but binding to option isn't. Something for us to think about.

Finally, the secret option is to not use two-way binding in this context, since it's really just a convenient wrapper around event listeners:

<script>
  let options = {
    name: {
      value: '',
      placeholder: 'enter your name'
    }
  };

  function updateValue(option, value) {
    options[option].value = value;
  }
</script>

{#each Object.keys(options) as option}
  <input
    on:input="{() => updateValue(option, e.target.value)}"
    placeholder={options[option].placeholder}
  >
{/each}
 <script>
  let options = {
    name: {
      value: '',
      placeholder: 'enter your name'
    },
  };
    
    $: console.table(options)
</script>

{#each Object.entries(options) as [key, option]}
  <input
    bind:value={option.value}
    placeholder={option.placeholder}
  >
{/each}

https://svelte.dev/repl/a77dd18da023469da962d873e6fb391f?version=3.47.0

与本文相关的文章

发布评论

评论列表(0)

  1. 暂无评论